10-Q: Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
Published on June 15, 2009
|
1.
|
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
____________________
FORM
10-Q
____________________
(Mark
One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the quarterly period ended April 30, 2009
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT
For the
transition period from ___________ to ____________
____________________
Commission
File No.
000-25809
____________________
Apollo
Medical Holdings, Inc.
(Name of
small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
20-8046599
|
|
State
of Incorporation
|
IRS
Employer Identification No.
|
|
1010
N. Central Avenue
|
||
Glendale,
California 91202
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
||
(818)
507-4617
|
||
(Issuer’s
telephone number)
|
Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes o No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer o, an accelerated filer
o, a
non-accelerated filer o, or a smaller reporting
company x.
1
APOLLO
MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX
TO FORM 10-Q FILING
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2009 AND 2008
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART
I
|
||
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
PAGE
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements - Unaudited
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet As of April 30, 2009 and January 31, 2009 and
January 31, 2009
|
3
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Three months ended April 30,
2009 and 2008
|
4
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Three months ended
April
30, 2009 and 2008
|
5
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6-16
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
16
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
17
|
Item
4.
|
Control
and Procedures.
|
18
|
PART
II
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
19
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and the Use of Proceeds
|
19
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
19
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
19
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
19
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
19
|
2
PART 1 -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 -
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
APOLLO
MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.
|
|||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|||
(UNAUDITED)
|
April
30,
|
January
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 59,220 | $ | 84,161 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
269,248 | 255,665 | ||||||
Due
from affiliate
|
2,050 | 2,050 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
17,963 | 25,025 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
348,481 | 366,901 | ||||||
Property
and equipment - net
|
36,992 | 47,330 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 385,474 | $ | 414,232 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT:
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ | 56,280 | $ | 65,141 | ||||
Shares
to be issued
|
378,500 | 284,000 | ||||||
Convertible
notes payable
|
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Convertible
notes payable-related party
|
23,000 | 23,000 | ||||||
Current
portion of loan
|
46,081 | 41,782 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
513,862 | 423,923 | ||||||
Loan
|
144,442 | 156,218 | ||||||
Convertible
notes payable-related party
|
75,000 | 75,000 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
733,304 | 655,141 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY/(DEFICIT):
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, par value $.001 and $0.0001 per share; 5,000,000
and
|
||||||||
25,000,000
shares authorized, respectively; none issued
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
Stock, par value $.001 and $0.0001, 100,000,000 shares
authorized,
|
||||||||
25,870,220
shares issued and outstanding
|
25,870 | 25,870 | ||||||
Non-controlling
interest
|
228,115 | 228,115 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
550,058 | 550,058 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(1,151,873 | ) | (1,044,951 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
(347,830 | ) | (240,909 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$ | 385,474 | $ | 414,232 | ||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
|
3
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|||
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDING APRIL 30, 2009 AND 2008
|
|||
(UNADITED)
|
For
the three months ended
|
||||||||
April
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
REVENUES
|
$ | 501,183 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||
Cost
of services - physician practice salaries, benefits and
other
|
419,554 | - | ||||||
General
and administrative
|
172,562 | 83,134 | ||||||
Depreciation
|
10,338 | - | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
602,455 | 83,134 | ||||||
LOSS
FROM OPERATIONS
|
(101,272 | ) | (73,134 | ) | ||||
OTHER EXPENSES:
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
4,849 | - | ||||||
NET
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
(106,121 | ) | (73,134 | ) | ||||
Provision
for Income Tax
|
800 | - | ||||||
NET
LOSS
|
$ | (106,921 | ) | $ | (73,134 | ) | ||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 13,492 | - | ||||||
Net loss attributable to Apollo Medical Holding, Inc. | $ | (120,413 | ) | $ | (73,134 | ) | ||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING,
|
||||||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED
|
25,870,220 | 20,933,490 | ||||||
*BASIC
AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE
|
(0.00 | ) | (0.00 | ) | ||||
*Weighted
average number of shares used to compute basic and diluted loss per share
is the same
|
||||||||
since
the effect of dilutive securities is anti-dilutive.
|
||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
|
4
APOLLO
MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.
|
||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||||||
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2009 AND 2008
|
||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
Three
months ended April 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||||
(used
in) operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (106,921 | ) | $ | (73,134 | ) | ||
Depreciation
|
10,338 | - | ||||||
Bad
debt expense
|
462 | - | ||||||
Shares
to be issued for services
|
94,500 | - | ||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(14,045 | ) | - | |||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
7,062 | - | ||||||
Due
from related party
|
- | 1,600 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(8,860 | ) | 53 | |||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(17,465 | ) | (71,481 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Property
and Equipment
|
- | - | ||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Payments
of notes payable
|
(7,477 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock for cash
|
305,000 | |||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(7,477 | ) | 305,000 | |||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(24,941 | ) | 233,519 | |||||
CASH
& CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING BALANCE
|
84,161 | 44,352 | ||||||
CASH
& CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING BALANCE
|
$ | 59,220 | $ | 277,871 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTARY
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Interest
paid during the quarter
|
$ | 2,582 | $ | - | ||||
Taxes
paid during the quarter
|
$ | 1,600 | $ | - |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
5
APOLLO
MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.
(FORMERLY
SICLONE INDUSTRIES, INC.)
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
Apollo
Medical Holdings, Inc. operates as a medical management holding company that
focuses on managing the provision of hospital-based medicine through a wholly
owned subsidiary-management company, Apollo Medical Management, Inc. (“AMM”).
Through AMM, the Company manages an affiliated medical group, which presently
consists of ApolloMed Hospitalists (“AMH”). AMM operates as a
Physician Practice Management Company (PPM) and is in the business of providing
management services to Physician Practice Companies (PPC) under Management
Service Agreements.
On June
13, 2008, Siclone Industries, Inc. (“Siclone”), Apollo Acquisition Co., Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Siclone (“Acquisition”), Apollo Medical Management,
Inc. (“Apollo Medical”) and the shareholders of Apollo Medical entered into an
agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of
the Merger Agreement, Apollo Medical merged with and into Acquisition. The
former shareholders of Apollo Medical received 20,933,490 shares of Siclone’s
common stock in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of Apollo
Medical.
The
acquisition of Apollo Medical is accounted for as a reverse acquisition under
the purchase method of accounting since the shareholders of Apollo Medical
obtained control of the consolidated entity. Accordingly,
the reorganization of the two companies is recorded as a recapitalization
of Apollo Medical, with Apollo Medical being treated as the continuing operating
entity. The historical financial statements presented herein will be those of
Apollo Medical. The continuing entity retained January 31 as its fiscal year
end. The financial statements of the legal acquirer are not significant;
therefore, no pro forma financial information is submitted.
On July
1, 2008, the continuing entity (i.e., the combined entity of Acquisition and
Apollo Medical) changed its name to Apollo Medical Management, Inc.
(AMM). On July 3, 2008, Siclone changed its name to Apollo Medical
Holdings, Inc. Following the merger, the Company is
headquartered in Glendale, California.
On August
1, 2008, AMM completed negotiations and executed a formal Management Services
Agreement with ApolloMed Hospitalists (“AMH”), under which AMM will provide
management services to AMH. The Agreement is effective as of August
1, 2008 and will allow AMM, which operates as a Physician Practice Management
Company, to consolidate AMH, which operates as a Physician Practice, in
accordance with EITF 97-2, Application of FASB Statement No. 94 and APB Opinion
No. 16 to Physician Management Entities and Certain Other Entities with
Contractual Management Agreements. The Management Services Agreement was amended
on March 20, 2009, to allow for the calculation of the fee on a monthly basis
with payment of the calculated fee each month. AMH is controlled by
Dr. Hosseinion and Dr. Vazquez, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
President, respectively.
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation
6
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared by Apollo in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for interim financial statements. The statements consist
solely of the management company, Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. prior to August
1, 2008. Commencing with the Company’s third quarter on August 1,
2008, and concurrent with the execution of the Management Services Agreement,
the statements reflect the consolidation of AMM and AMH , in accordance with
EITF 97-2, Application of FASB Statement No. 94 and APB Opinion No. 16 to
Physician Management Entities and Certain Other Entities with Contractual
Management Agreements . In management’s opinion, all adjustments, consisting of
normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the results
of the interim periods are reflected herein. Operating results for the three
month period ended April 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of future
financial results.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements and notes are presented as permitted
by Form 10-Q and do not contain all of the information that is included in the
annual financial statements and notes of the Company. The condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes presented herein should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Statement
of financial accounting standard No. 107, Disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments, requires that the Company disclose estimated fair values
of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the statements of
financial position for assets and liabilities qualifying as financial
instruments are a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Credit
and Supply Risk
The
Company’s case rate and capitation revenues, reported by Apollo’s affiliate,
AMH, are governed by contractual agreements with medical groups/IPA’s and
hospitals. As a result, receivables from this business are generally
fully collected. The Company does face issues related to the timing of these
collections, and the Company must assess the level of earned but uncollected
revenue to which it is entitled at each period end. The Company does face
collection issues with regard to its fee-for-service revenues. One is the
estimation of the amount to be received from each billing since the Company
invoices on a Medicare schedule and each of many providers remits payment on a
reduced schedule. The Company has to estimate the amount it will
ultimately receive form each billing and properly record revenue. With a wide
variety of contract terms and providers, the Company’s revenue is not
concentrated or dependent on a specific contract. No individual
contract with our clients provides more than 20 percent of reported
revenues.
7
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.” This Statement identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in
the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). This Statement will not have an impact
on the Company’s financial statements.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee
Insurance Contracts, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” The scope of
this Statement is limited to financial guarantee insurance (and reinsurance)
contracts, as described in this Statement, issued by enterprises included within
the scope of Statement 60. Accordingly, this Statement does not apply to
financial guarantee contracts issued by enterprises excluded from the scope of
Statement 60 or to some insurance contracts that seem similar to financial
guarantee insurance contracts issued by insurance enterprises (such as mortgage
guaranty insurance or credit insurance on trade receivables). This Statement
also does not apply to financial guarantee insurance contracts that are
derivative instruments included within the scope of FASB Statement No. 133,
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” This Statement
will not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4,
“Determining Fair Values When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not
Orderly.” This FSP provides guidance on
(1) estimating the fair value of an asset or liability when the volume and
level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly declined and
(2) identifying transactions that are not orderly. The FSP also amends
certain disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 157 to require, among other
things, disclosures in interim periods of the inputs and valuation techniques
used to measure fair value. This pronouncement is effective prospectively
beginning April 1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
this standard, but would not expect it to have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
“Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (FSP 115-2).
This FSP modifies the requirements for recognizing other-than-temporarily
impaired debt securities and changes the existing impairment model for such
securities. The FSP also requires additional disclosures for both annual and
interim periods with respect to both debt and equity securities. Under the FSP,
impairment of debt securities will be considered other-than-temporary if an
entity (1) intends to sell the security, (2) more likely than not will
be required to sell the security before recovering its cost, or (3) does
not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized cost basis (even if the
entity does not intend to sell). The FSP further indicates that, depending on
which of the above factor(s) causes the impairment to be considered
other-than-temporary, (1) the entire shortfall of the security’s fair value
versus its amortized cost basis or (2) only the credit loss portion would
be recognized in earnings while the remaining shortfall (if any) would be
recorded in other comprehensive income. FSP 115-2 requires entities to initially
apply the provisions of the standard to previously other-than-temporarily
impaired debt securities existing as of the date of initial adoption by making a
cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the
period of adoption. The cumulative-effect adjustment potentially reclassifies
the noncredit portion of a previously other-than-temporarily impaired debt
security held as of the date of initial adoption from retained earnings to
accumulated other comprehensive income. This pronouncement is effective
April 1, 2009. The Company does not believe this standard will have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial
condition.
8
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This FSP essentially
expands the disclosure about fair value of financial instruments that were
previously required only annually to also be required for interim period
reporting. In addition, the FSP requires certain additional disclosures
regarding the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair
value of financial instruments. These additional disclosures will be required
beginning with the quarter ending June 30, 2009. The Company is currently
evaluating the requirements of these additional disclosures.
Stock-based
compensation
On
October 17, 2006 the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment, an
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” As of the date of this report the Company
has no stock based incentive plan in effect.
Basic
and Diluted Earnings Per Share
Earnings
per share is calculated in accordance with the Statement of financial accounting
standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128), “Earnings per share”. SFAS No. 128 superseded
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.15 (APB 15). Net income (loss) per share
for all periods presented has been restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No.
128. Basic net income per share is based upon the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per share is based on the
assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted
or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under
this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning
of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained
thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during
the period.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and
cash equivalents include cash in bank representing Company’s current operating
account
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes Case Rate and Capitation revenue when persuasive evidence of
an arrangement exists, service has been rendered, the sales price is fixed or
determinable, and collection is reasonable assured. Fee for Service
revenues are recorded at amounts reasonably assured to be collected. The
determination of reasonably assured collections is based on historical Fee for
Service collections as a percent of billings. The provisions are adjusted to
reflect actual collections in subsequent periods.
The
estimation and the reporting of patient responsibility revenues is highly
subjective and depends on the payer mix, contractual reimbursement rates,
collection experiences, judgment and other factors. The Company’s fee
arrangements are with various payers, including managed care organizations,
hospitals, insurance companies, individuals, Medicare and Medicaid.
9
3. Uncertainty
of ability to continue as a going concern
The
Company's financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted
accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the
realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of
business. However, the Company has an accumulated deficit
of $1,151,873 as of April 30, 2009. Cash Flows used in
Operating Activities for the three months ended April 30, 2009 was
$17,464.
The
financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of liabilities
that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern.
The
Company’s need for working capital is a key issue for management and necessary
for the Company to meet its goals and objectives. The Company is actively
pursuing additional capitalization opportunities. Management believes that the
above actions will allow the Company to continue operations through the next
fiscal year.
4. Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
Receivable is stated at the amount management expects to collect from
outstanding balances. An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided for those
accounts receivable considered to be uncollectible, based upon historical
experience and management's evaluation of outstanding accounts receivable at
each quarter end. As of April 30, 2009, Accounts Receivable totals $269,248, net
of a provision for bad debt expense of $11,927, and represents amounts invoiced
by AMH. Accounts receivable was $255,665, net of the provision for bad debt
expense of $11,465, on January 31, 2009.
5. Due
from affiliate
Due from
affiliate totals $2,050 and represents amounts due from AMA, an unconsolidated
Affiliate of the Company as of April 30, 2009 and January 31, 2009.
..
6. Prepaid
expenses
Prepaid
expenses of $17,963 and $25,025 as of April 30, 2009 and January 31, 2009,
respectively, are amounts prepaid for medical malpractice insurance and
Director’s and Officer’s insurance.
7. Property
and Equipment
Property
and Equipment consists of the following as of :
10
April
30, 2009
|
January
31, 2009
|
|||||||
Computers
|
$ | 13,912 | $ | 13,912 | ||||
Software
|
138,443 | 138,443 | ||||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
50,815 | 50,815 | ||||||
Gross
Property and Equipment
|
203,170 | 203,170 | ||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(166,178 | ) | (155,840 | ) | ||||
Net
Property and Equipment
|
$ | 36,992 | $ | 47,330 |
Depreciation
expense was $10,337 and $0 for the three month periods ended April 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
8. Accounts
Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following as of:
April
30, 2009
|
January
31, 2009
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 30,599 | $ | 30,599 | ||||
Accrued
interest
|
2,776 | 507 | ||||||
Accrued
professional fees
|
16,000 | 20,267 | ||||||
Accrued
payroll and income taxes
|
8,905 | 13,768 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 56,280 | $ | 65,141 |
9. Shares
to be Issued
Shares to
be issued consist of the following:
April
30, 2009
|
January
31, 2009
|
|||||||
Accrued
shares to be issued for note conversion
|
$ | 200,000 | $ | 200,000 | ||||
Accrued
shares to be issued for services
|
178,500 | 84,000 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 378,500 | $ | 284,000 |
11
As of
April 30, 2009, 266,667 shares were not yet issued for note conversions and
661,111 shares are to be issued for the services rendered through April 30,
2009.
10. Convertible
Notes Payable
During
the year ended January 31, 2009, the Company received $210,000 proceeds from the
issuance of convertible notes payable. The convertible notes bear
interest at 10% and are due twelve months from the date of issuance ranging from
October 7, 2008 to December 12, 2008. In connection with the convertible notes,
the Company issued 140,000 warrants to the note holders with an exercise price
of $1.50. There were no issuances of Convertible Notes, or attached
warrants, in the first quarter of 2009.
|
The
Company recorded value of warrants using the Black Scholes pricing model
using the following assumptions: Stock price $0.27,
Expected life of 3 years, Risk free bond rate of 1.05% to 2.00%
and volatility of 44% to 61%. Based on the assumptions used the
Company recorded the fair value of warrants amounting to $379
which was fully amortized as interest expense during year ended January
31, 2009.
|
As of
January 31, 2009, the Company received the conversion notice from the note
holders to convert $200,000 of notes into shares of the Company’s common stock.
This amount is included in the Shares to be Issued Liabilities and
the remaining $10,000 is shown as Convertible Notes payable on the accompanying
financial statements.
The
Company recorded interest expense of $2,268, related to
Convertible Notes in the quarter ended April 30, 2009 and zero for April 30,
2008.
11. Convertible
Notes Payable-Related Party
During
the year ended January 31, 2008, the Company received $23,000 proceeds from the
issuance of convertible notes payable to relatives of the CEO of the Company.
The convertible notes bear interest at 10% and are due twelve months from
December 25, 2008. In connection with the convertible notes, the Company issued
15,333 warrants to the note holders with an exercise price of $1.50. The Company
recorded value of warrants of $ 68 using the Black Scholes pricing model using
the following assumptions: Stock price $0.27, Expected life of 3 years, Risk
free bond rate of 1.14% and volatility of 49%.
The
Company received $70,000 proceeds from the issuance of notes payable to the
father of the Company’s CEO. The note was due and payable in full no later than
October 1, 2008, carried no interest rate, and the Company was obligated to pay
an origination fee of $5,000 at the time of payoff. The note was
extended by verbal agreement on its expiration date with no change in terms. On
January 24, 2009, the Company formalized the note extension with the father of
the Company’s CEO. Under the terms of the new note, the $5,000
origination fee was added to the note, the due date was extended to March 31,
2011, the interest rate was set at eight 8% and the note is initially
convertible into 214,285 shares of common stock. The Company has the
right to redeem the note at a 105 percent premium any time prior to the due date
on March 31, 2011.
12
12. Notes
payable
There
were no additions to Notes Payable in the quarter ended April 30 ,
2009.
During
the year ended January 31, 2009, the Company borrowed $125,000 on June 13, 2008
from a non-related party. The note bears no interest rate and was due
and payable in full on July 2, 2008. The note was paid off as of
October 31, 2008. The Company recorded a penalty of $6,250 during the
nine months ended October 31, 2008 due to late payment.
Also,
during the third quarter, the Company borrowed $125,000 on September 24, 2008
under a note. This note bore an interest rate of 15 percent and was due and
payable in full on October 22, 2008. The note obligated the Company
for an origination fee of $10,000 and reimbursement of legal fees totaling
$1,500 and issuance of 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The note,
along with the origination fee and legal reimbursement, was paid off in full on
October 20, 2008.
13. Related
Party Transactions
During
the three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company generated revenue of
$56,491 and $10,000, respectively, by providing management services to ApolloMed
Hospitalists (AMH), an affiliated company with common ownership interest.
Commencing August 1, 2008, the management services fee income reported by AMM
was eliminated in consolidation against similar costs recorded at
AMH.
The
Company borrowed $70,000 on a short-term promissory note in the quarter ended
July 2008 from a related party of the Chief Executive officer of the
Company. The $70,000 note was due and payable in full no later than
October 1, 2008, carries no interest rate, and the Company was obligated to pay
an origination fee of $5,000 at the time of payoff. The note was
extended by verbal agreement on its expiration date with no change in terms. On
January 24, 2009, the Company formalized the note extension. Under
the terms of the new note, the $5,000 origination fee was added to the note, the
due date was extended to March 31, 2011, the interest rate was set at eight (8)
percent and the note is initially convertible into 214,285 shares of
common stock. The Company has the right to redeem the note at a 105
percent premium prior to March 31, 2011. (Note 11)
Also,
during the fourth quarter 2009, the Company issued Convertible Notes in amounts
aggregating to $23,000 to two relatives of Warren Hosseinion, the Company’s CEO
(Note 11).
14. Loan
13
The
Company, through AMH, has a SBA line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank. The loan
was established on January 5, 2006, provided a total available credit of
$200,000 and had a final maturity date of February 10, 2009. The
interest rate is the bank’s prime rate plus 2. The loan is collateralized
by all machinery, equipment, furniture, accounts, inventory and general
intangibles of AMH and personally guaranteed by the CEO of the
Company.
On
February 3, 2009, the Company’s SBA line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank was, by
mutual agreement, converted into a four-year fully amortizable loan. The credit
line was reduced to $198,000. The interest rate remained at the bank’s prime
rate 5.25% plus 2 percentage points and the maturity date was
extended to February 10, 2013 and all collateral and guarantor remained
unchanged.
As of
April 30, 2009, the outstanding balance against this facility was $190,523, with
$46,081 in current portion. Interest expense of $2,582 related to the SBA loan
was recorded during the quarter ended April 30, 2009.
The
Company also has an overdraft facility with Wells Fargo Bank. This facility is
attached to the AMH bank account and provides up to $70,000 of overdraft and
short-term borrowing capacity. Draws under the facility carry an 8 percent
interest rate. The Company has not utilized this
facility.
15. Non-Controlling Interest
The
Company recorded AMH ownership interest in the accompanied financial statements
as Non-Controlling Interest amounting to $228,115 during the year ended January
31, 2009. No addition has been recorded during the quarter ended April 30,
2009.
16.
Stockholder’s Equity
The
Company did not issue any shares or warrants in the quarter ended April 30,
2009.
During
the period from February 1, 2007 to July 31, 2007, Apollo Medical issued 364,000
shares to investors for a total cash value $182,000. As part of issuance of
shares for cash the Company granted 91,000 stock warrants to investors. During
the period from February 1, 2008 to July 31, 2008, Apollo Medical issued 670,000
shares to investors for a total cash value $335,000. As part of issuance of
shares for cash the Company granted 167,500 stock warrants to
investors.
As the
result of the merger on June 13, 2008, the former shareholders of Apollo Medical
received 20,933,490 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for all the
issued and outstanding shares of Apollo Medical. Certain former shareholders of
Apollo Medical received 470,470 warrants in exchange for warrants granted to
them in previous fund raising.
During
the three month period ended October 31, 2008, the Company issued 268,687 shares
for legal, accounting and investment advisory services provided to the Company.
The Company also issued 50,000 shares as financing fee on a note
payable.
On
October 27, 2008, the Company entered into a Board of Director’s Agreement with
Suresh Nihalani. The
Company issued a stock award of 400,000 shares to Mr. Nihalani, under the terms
of the Director’s Agreement, which shares will be issued ratably over a
thirty-six month period commencing December 2008. During the year ended
January 2009, Mr. Nihalani was issued 11,111 shares under this
agreement.
14
Warrants
outstanding:
Aggregate intrinsic
value |
Number
of warrants
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at January 31, 2009
|
$ | — | 625,803 | |||||
Granted
|
— | — | ||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | ||||||
Cancelled
|
— | — | ||||||
Outstanding
at April 30, 2009
|
$ | — | 625,803 |
Exercise
Price |
Warrants
outstanding |
Weighted
average
remaining contractual life |
Warrants
exercisable |
Weighted
average
exercise price |
||||||||||||
$ |
1.10
|
470,470
|
1.54
|
470,470
|
$
|
0.83
|
||||||||||
$ |
1.50
|
155,333
|
0.76
|
155,333
|
$
|
0.37
|
||||||||||
625,803
|
2.30
|
625,803
|
17.
Commitments and Contingency
On March
15, 2009, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Kaneohe Advisors
LLC (Kyle Francis) under which Mr. Francis would become the Company’s Executive
Vice President, Business Development and Strategy. Under the terms of the
Agreement, Mr. Francis will be paid $8,000 per month, of which $2,000 will be
paid in cash and $6,000 will be deferred. In addition, Mr. Francis
received 350,000 shares of restricted stock at the date of the Agreement and is
entitled to 350,000 additional restricted shares on the first and second
anniversaries of the Agreement, provided the Agreement is not terminated
.. The initial 350,000 shares, along with 50,000 shares granted to Mr.
Francis in the year ended January 2009, have been accrued as shares to be issued
as a liability in the accompanying financial statements.
On
September 4, 2008, Apollo Medical Management, Inc. executed an employment
agreement with Jilbert Issai, M.D., to provide services as Senior Vice
President. The agreement is for an initial one-year term with
provision for successive one-year periods. Under the agreement,
Doctor Issai is entitled to a nominal salary and may be granted options to
purchase an aggregate of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $.10 per share when and if the Company is to adopt a stock
compensation plan.
15
The
Company entered into an Advisory Agreement with Stonecreek Associates, Inc. on
October 27, 2008, under which Stonecreek will provide investment advisory
services to the Company. Apollo is obligated to pay a fee to
Stonecreek on completion of any debt or equity financing. The
agreement terminated on March 31, 2009.
On
October 27, 2008, the Company entered into a Board of Director’s Agreement with
Suresh Nihalani. The Company will issue a stock award of 400,000
shares to Mr. Nihalani, under the terms of the Director’s Agreement, which
shares will be issued ratably over a thirty-six month period commencing December
2008. The shares will be released to Mr. Nihalani on a monthly basis
during his tenure as a Director. The distribution of shares will
continue as long as Mr. Nihalani serves on the Board, but
will cease when Mr. Nihalani is no longer is a Director. Mr. Nihalani was
issued 11,111 shares under this agreement in the year ended January 31, 2009. In
addition, 11,111 shares have been accrued as shares to be issued as a liability
in the accompanying financial statements
The
Company received a claim for $250,000 relating to amounts purportedly owed by
the Company as a result of the initial reverse acquisition
transaction. This dispute relates to the initial letter dated June 3,
2008. The terms of the letter of intent call for, among other things,
the payment of cash of $250,000 within 60 days of closing. The letter
of intent states, however, that it is intended to serve as a memorandum of the
Parties current discussions, and that a definitive transaction agreement will
follow. The letter of intent further states that both parties
acknowledge that all provisions of the letter of intent are non binding, and
that no contract or agreement providing for a transaction shall be deemed to
exist unless and until a final agreement has been negotiated and
executed. The final merger agreement that was executed contains a
clause that it is the “entire agreement” and thus supersedes all previous
agreements including the letter of intent; moreover, management contends that
there are no additional amounts owed under the final merger agreement. The
Company has not accrued for any amount asserted in the above claim as the
attorney of the Company has advised that the claim is in its early stage and the
outcome of this matter could not be predicted at this stage.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three
Months Ended April 31, 2009 vs. Three Months Ended April 31, 2008
Revenues
Apollo
reported revenues of $501,183 for the quarter ended April 2009, compared to
revenues of $10,000 in the comparable quarter ended April 2008. Prior
to the Management Services Agreement executed on August 1, 2008, the Company
could only report the management fees charged to its affiliate, AMH. Subsequent
to August 1, 2008, revenues represent the billings by AMH under the various fee
structures from health plans, medical groups/IPA’s and hospitals. Management fee
revenues have been eliminated subsequent to August 1, 2008.
Cost
of Services
16
Cost
of Services was $419,554 for the
three months ended April 2009, compared to Cost of Services of $ 0 for the
corresponding three months ended April 2008. Cost of Services includes the
payroll and consulting costs of the physicians, all payroll related costs,
costs for all medical malpractice insurance and physician
privileges.
|
Operating
Expenses
General
and Administrative expenses were $172,562 for the three months ended April
30, 2009, compared to General and Administrative expenses of $83,134
reported in the comparable three months of April 30, 2008. In the first
quarter of 2009, the Company recorded non-cash compensation expenses
totaling $94,500, related to the issuance of shares for service. There
were no comparable non-cash expenses in the first quarter of
2008.
|
Loss
from Operations
The
Company reported a Loss from Operations of $101,272 for the three month period
ended April 30, 2009, compared to a Loss from Operations of $73,134 for the
comparable three months ended April 30, 2008. The increased loss of
$28,138 from 2008 to 2009 was due to the high costs of service relative to the
revenues generated from the Company’s contracts, as the Company has not yet
achieved economies of scale in its activities. In addition, the loss from
operations in the quarter ended April 2009 was further impacted by compensation
and consulting costs. The Loss from Operations in the quarter ended
April 2008 was due to the fact that the low level of management Fee income was
insufficient to cover the costs of services and administrative costs in this
formative year.
Net
Loss
A net
loss of $106,921 was reported for the three months ended April 30, 2009 verses a
net loss of $73,134 for the three months ended April 30, 2008. The
increased loss of $33,787 was primarily due to non-cash compensation costs
incurred in the quarter just ended.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At April
30, 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $59,220, compared to cash
and cash equivalents of $84,161 at the beginning of the fiscal year at January
31, 2009. Short-term borrowings totaled $79,081 at April 30, 2009, compared to
$74,782 as of January 31, 2009. The Company had no short-term
borrowings at January 31, 2008. Long-term borrowings totaled $219,442 as of
April 30, 2009, compared to long-term borrowings of $231,218 on January 31,
2009.
.
Net cash
used in operating activities totaled a $17,464 for the three months ended April
30, 2009, compared to $71,481 for the comparable three months ended April 30,
2008. The significantly larger operating loss, including the $250,000
paid and expensed on the Siclone Merger, was primarily responsible for the
increase in the negative operating cash flow.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
17
The Company does not hold any
derivative instruments and does not engage in any hedging
activities.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
a.
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures.
|
We
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were ineffective as of April 30,
2009. Management has identified the following three material
weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures, and internal controls over
financial reporting:
1.
We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and
procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial
reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of
our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure
controls and procedures, and concluded that the control deficiency that resulted
represented a material weakness.
2.
We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions,
which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation
of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically
feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions,
the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by
separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to
have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and
procedures, and concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented
a material weakness.
3. We
do not have review and supervision procedures for financial reporting functions.
The review and supervision function of internal control relates to the accuracy
of financial information reported. The failure to review and supervise could
allow the reporting of inaccurate or incomplete financial information. Due to
our size and nature, review and supervision may not always be possible or
economically feasible. Management evaluated the impact of our significant
number of audit adjustments, and concluded that the control deficiency that
resulted represented a material weakness.
Based on
the foregoing materials weaknesses, we have determined that, as of April 30,
2009, the effectiveness of our controls and procedures over financial accounting
and reporting are insufficient. The Company is taking steps to
improve the timeliness and accuracy of its financial information, including the
hiring of additional employees to facilitate proper segregation of
duties. It should be noted that any system of controls, however well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance
that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any
control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of
certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control
systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how
remote.
The
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange
Act). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives.
18
b. Changes
in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There has
been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most
recently completed fiscal quarter (i.e., the three-month period ended April 30,
2009) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
The
Company was not a party to any legal proceedings as of April 30, 2009 and is not
aware of any pending legal actions.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The
Company did not sell any Equity Securities during the periods covered by this
filing.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
There were no defaults upon senior
securities during the period ended April 30, 2008.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to the
vote of securities holders during the period ended April 30, 2008.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code.
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States
Code.
|
19
SIGNATURES
APOLLO
MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.
|
||
Dated:
June 12, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
Warren Hosseinion
|
Warren
Hosseinion
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer and Director
|
||
Dated:
June 12, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
A. Noel DeWinter
|
A. Noel
DeWinter
|
||
Chief
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|
||
20