As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2015

Registration No. 333-202602

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

700 North Brand Blvd., Suite 220

Glendale, California 91203

(818) 396-8050

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive
offices)

Warren Hosseinion, M.D.

Chief Executive Officer

Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc.

700 North Brand Blvd., Suite 220

Glendale, California 91203

(818) 396-8050

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

With copies to:

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Up to $15 Million in Shares of Common Stock and Warrants to Purchase Shares of Common Stock

This is a firm commitment public offering (the “Offering”) of shares of common stock and warrants of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. We are offering up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of common stock described herein (and the shares issuable from time to time upon exercise of the warrants) pursuant to this prospectus based upon an assumed offering price of $5.00 (the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB on May 6, 2015) for one share and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock. The shares and warrants will be separately issued. Each warrant will have a right to purchase one-half of one share of common stock, have an exercise price of 125% of the offering price per share, be exercisable upon issuance and expire five years from the date of issuance.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “AMEHD.” We have received conditional approval to list our common stock and warrants on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols “AMEH” and “AMEHW”, respectively, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and meeting all of the Nasdaq Capital Market listing standards on the date of this Offering. The last reported sale price of our common stock on May 5, 2015, on the OTCQB was $6.94 per share. This amount reflects a one-for-ten reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock that we effected on April 24, 2015.

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Before making any investment in our securities, you should read and carefully consider the risks described in this prospectus under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 of this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

We have granted the underwriters an option for a period of 45 days to purchase up to 450,000 additional shares of our common stock and/or warrants to purchase 225,000 shares of our common stock solely to cover over-allotments, if any. The additional shares and/or warrants issuable upon exercise of the underwriter option are identical to those offered by this prospectus and have been registered under the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

The underwriters expect to deliver our shares of common stock and warrants to purchasers in the Offering on or about           , 2015.

Aegis Capital Corp

The date of this prospectus is            , 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus, any amendment or supplement hereto, any free writing prospectus prepared by us or on our behalf, or any document incorporated herein by reference. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different or supplemental. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of common stock and warrants only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus, any free writing prospectus, or document incorporated herein by reference is current as of the date hereof, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any free writing prospectus or of any sale of the common stock and warrants, and we make no undertaking to update such information or statements.

For investors outside the United States: Other than with respect to actions we have taken in the United States, neither we nor any of the underwriters have taken any action that would permit this Offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any other jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the offering of shares of common stock and the distribution of this prospectus applicable in their jurisdiction.

This prospectus contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties relating to market size, expenditures, growth and other data about our industry. We have not independently verified the statistical and other industry data generated by independent parties and contained in this prospectus and, accordingly, we cannot guarantee their accuracy or completeness.

This prospectus includes registered and unregistered trademarks of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc., its subsidiaries and its consolidated affiliates, as well as the registered and unregistered trademarks of others. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks appearing in this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We caution readers that this prospectus contains “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements, written, oral or otherwise, are based on our current expectations or beliefs rather than historical facts concerning future events, and they are indicated by words or phrases such as, but not limited to, “anticipate,” “could,” “may,” “might,” “potential,” “predict,” “should,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “believe,” “think,” “plan,” “envision,” “continue,” “intend,” “target,” “contemplate,” “budgeted,” “will” and similar or comparable words, phrases or terminology. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. We caution that these statements are further qualified by important economic, competitive, governmental and technological factors that could cause our business, strategy, or actual results or events to differ materially, or otherwise, from those in the forward-looking statements in this prospectus. We have based such forward-looking statements on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections, and therefore there can be no assurance that any forward-looking statement contained herein, or otherwise, will prove to be accurate. The Company assumes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.

We have a relatively limited operating history compared to others in our industry and we operate in a rapidly changing industry segment. As a result, our ability to predict results, or the actual effect of future plans or strategies, based on historical results or trends or otherwise, is inherently uncertain. While we believe that the forward-looking statements herein are reasonable, they are merely predictions or illustrations of potential outcomes, and they involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many beyond our control, that are likely to cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company on a condensed basis include those factors discussed under “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this prospectus, and include, but are not limited to, the following:

All written and oral forward-looking statements made in connection with this Registration Statement on Form S-1 that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Given the uncertainties that surround such statements, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

RISK FACTORS

If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially harmed. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties may also impair our business operations or financial condition. You should consider carefully the following factors, in addition to the other information concerning the Company and its business, before you decide to buy or hold shares of our common stock.

Risk Relating to Our Business

We might need to raise additional capital, which might not be available.

The Company has historically incurred significant losses, and we may require additional equity or debt financing for additional working capital, to fund acquisitions, or to meet our liabilities, including our maturing short term obligations. In the event of additional financing being unavailable to us, we may be unable to operate or continue in existence, and the price of our common stock may decline and we may be or be made bankrupt.

We have a history of losses, and may have to further reduce our costs by curtailing future operations to continue as a business.

Historically we have had operating losses and our cash flow has been inadequate to support our ongoing operations. For the nine months ended December 31, 2014, we had a net loss of $1.99 million, and as of December 31, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of $19.53 million. Our ability to fund our capital requirements out of our available cash and cash generated from our operations depends on a number of factors, including our ability to integrate recently acquired businesses and continue growing our existing operations. If we cannot continue to generate positive cash flow from operations, we will have to reduce our costs and try to raise working capital from other sources. These measures could materially and adversely affect our ability to execute our operations and expand our business.

The terms of our debt agreements could restrict our operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes in our business or to take specified actions and an event of default under our debt agreements could harm our business.

Our existing secured debt agreements with NNA of Nevada, Inc. (“NNA”), an affiliate of Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA (“Fresenius”), contain, and any future indebtedness would likely contain, a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to take actions that may be in our best interests. Our existing debt agreements include covenants that generally:

As discussed below in the risk factor entitled “Laws regulating the corporate practice of medicine could restrict the manner in which we are permitted to conduct our business and the failure to comply with such laws could subject us to penalties or require a corporate restructuring,” we have certain contractual rights relating to the transfer of equity interests in some of our affiliated physician group through Physician Shareholders agreements with Dr. Hosseinion, the controlling stockholder of our affiliated physician groups. Dr. Hosseinion’s ceasing to serve as a senior executive under his employment agreement would be an event of default under the debt agreements with NNA, unless he died or became disabled or was replaced by a new senior executive reasonably satisfactory to NNA. In the event that an event of default has occurred under the terms of our debt agreements with NNA, NNA has the right to require us to exercise this equity transfer right in favor of a transferee approved by NNA. If NNA exercised this right, in addition to any other remedies NNA would be entitled to under our debt agreements, we may lose control of our affiliated physician groups which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

NNA has a security interest over all of our assets and those of our subsidiaries and (with limited exceptions) affiliates, and NNA would be able to foreclose on our assets if we defaulted on our obligations under the NNA debt agreements.

If we defaulted on our obligations to NNA, they would be able to exercise various remedies, including foreclosing on and selling our assets and those of our subsidiaries, and using the proceeds to pay down our outstanding obligations to NNA.

Certain of NNA’s rights under the financing agreements would continue after we repay all our debt to NNA.

As discussed in “Our Business - NNA Financing Arrangements,” we have granted NNA various rights, including the right to nominate a director and appoint a board observer and to participate in certain equity offerings, that will survive the repayment of our debt to NNA.

NNA has consent rights over certain corporate decisions.

As discussed above regarding our debt arrangements with NNA and as further discussed in “Our Business - NNA Financing Arrangements,” we have needed and may in the future need NNA’s consent for a number of different types of transactions. NNA could at any time withhold or condition its consent at its sole discretion. Consequently, we would be unable to take the action to which NNA did not consent or, if we did so without NNA’s consent, we would be in default under the agreements with NNA and NNA would have the right to enforce various remedies, including requiring immediate repayment of any outstanding indebtedness under those agreements. NNA’s enforcement of its remedies would likely have a material adverse effect on us and our business.

We have to make significant expenditures to service our existing debt, which may reduce our ability to continue expanding.

We have significant outstanding debt obligations, including the obligations with NNA described above and our 9% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, which become due and payable on February 15, 2016 unless converted. As a result, we have to devote significant resources to servicing our existing debt load, and may be unable to devote sufficient resources to our ongoing growth and expansion. This may have a material adverse effect on us and our business.

We are required to prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement covering the sale of NNA’s registrable securities by June 26, 2015 or, if this Offering is completed, 125 days after the date of completion.

We are required to prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement covering the sale of NNA’s registrable securities by June 26, 2015 or, if this Offering is completed, 125 days after the date of completion. If we fail to do so, on June 26, 2015 (or 125 days after the completion of the Offering) and for each month thereafter until we file the registration statement registering NNA’s registrable securities, we must pay NNA liquidated damages of 1.5% of the total purchase price of the registrable securities owned by NNA, payable in Common Stock. This may result in the dilution of the ownership interests of our stockholders.

We are required to obtain NNA’s consent to the preparation and filing of any registration statement. NNA has provided consent for this Offering, but only if the Offering is completed before May 29, 2015.

If this Offering is not completed before May 29, 2015, we will have to obtain a new consent from NNA, and there can be no assurance that NNA would provide a new consent. If NNA did not provide a new consent, or conditioned its consent on new requirements, we may be forced to terminate this Offering or modify its terms.

The Company has a limited operating history that makes it difficult to reliably predict future growth and operating results.

The predecessor to ApolloMed was incorporated in California in 2001, and served initially as the management company for our affiliated medical group, ApolloMed Hospitalists. In addition, ApolloMed was awarded its ACO license under CMS’ MSSP in July 2012. ApolloMed has limited experience operating an ACO or managed care organization. Accordingly, we have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our business prospects, which makes it difficult to forecast ApolloMed’s future operating results. The evolving nature of the current medical services industry increases these uncertainties. You must consider the Company’s business prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and problems frequently encountered by companies with limited operating histories. Our ability to predict growth at any time in the future may be limited.

We may be unable to successfully integrate recently acquired and launched entities and may have difficulty predicting the future needs of those entities.

In 2014, ApolloMed (including its affiliates that are wholly-owned by Dr. Hosseinion) acquired Southern California Heart Centers, AKM Medical Group, a Los Angeles based IPA, Best Choice Hospice Care LLC and Holistic Health Home Health Care Inc., and launched ApolloMed Care Clinic and ApolloMed Palliative Services, LLC. As a result of our rapid expansion we may be unable to successfully integrate the various entities we have acquired or formed. Further, these entities operate in different areas of the health care industry, and we cannot accurately predict how these acquired entities will perform in the future.

The growth strategy of the Company may not prove viable and expected growth and value may not be realized.

Our business strategy is to rapidly grow by managing a network of medical groups providing certain hospital-based services and integrated inpatient and outpatient physician networks. We also seek growth opportunities through the acquisition of target medical groups and other service providers. Identifying quality acquisition candidates is a time-consuming and costly process. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying and establishing relationships with these and other candidates. If the Company is successful in identifying and acquiring other entities, our ability to successfully implement our business plan and achieve targeted financial results is dependent on successfully integrating those entities. The process of integrating acquired entities involves risks. These risks include, but are not limited to:

There is no assurance that we will be able to manage the integration of our acquisitions or the growth of such acquisitions effectively.

An element of our growth strategy is also the expansion of our business by developing new palliative care programs in our existing markets and in new markets. This aspect of our growth strategy may not be successful, which could adversely impact our overall growth and profitability. We cannot assure you that we will be able to:

We may not make appropriate acquisitions, may fail to integrate them into our business, or these acquisitions could alter our current payor mix and reduce our income.

Our business is significantly dependent on locating and acquiring or partnering with medical practices or individual physicians to provide health care services. As part of our growth strategy, we regularly review potential acquisition opportunities. We believe that there continue to be a number of acquisition opportunities that would be complementary to our business. We cannot predict whether we will be successful in pursuing such acquisition opportunities or what the consequences of any such acquisitions would be. If we are not successful in finding attractive acquisition candidates that we can acquire on satisfactory terms, or if we cannot successfully complete and efficiently integrate those acquisitions that we identify, we may not be able to implement our business model, which would likely negatively impact our revenues and income. Furthermore, our acquisition strategy involves a number of risks and uncertainties, including:

Changes to the fair value of contingent payments to be paid in connection with our acquisitions may result in significant fluctuations to our results of operations.

In connection with our recent acquisitions we are required to make certain contingent payments. The fair value of such payments is re-evaluated periodically based on changes in our estimate of future operating results and changes in market discount rates. Any changes in our estimated fair value are recognized in our results of operations. Increases in the amount of contingent payments were are required to make may have an adverse effect on our operations.

Our management team’s attention may be diverted by recent acquisitions and searches for new acquisition targets, and our business and operations may suffer adverse consequences as a result.

Mergers and acquisitions are time intensive, requiring significant commitment of our management team’s focus and resources. If our management team spends too much time focused on recent acquisitions or on potential acquisition targets, our management team may not have sufficient time to focus on our existing business and operations. This diversion of attention could have material and adverse consequences on our operations and our ability to be profitable.

We may be unable to scale our operations successfully.

Our growth strategy will place significant demands on our management and financial, administrative and other resources. Operating results will depend substantially on the ability of our officers and key employees to manage changing business conditions and to implement and improve our financial, administrative and other resources. If the Company is unable to respond to and manage changing business conditions, or the scale of its operations, then the quality of its services, its ability to retain key personnel, and its business could be harmed.

We could experience significant losses under our capitation-based contracts if the medical expenses we incur exceed revenues.

In California, health plans typically prospectively pay an IPA a fixed Per Member Per Month amount, or capitation payment, which is often based on a percentage of the amount received by the health plan. Capitation payments to IPAs, in the aggregate, represent a prospective budget from which the IPA manages care-related expenses on behalf of the population enrolled with that IPA. If our IPAs are able to manage care-related expenses under the capitated levels we realize an operating profit on our capitation contracts. However, if our care-related expenses exceed projected levels, our IPAs may realize substantial operating deficits, which are not capped and could lead to substantial losses for our Company.

Our future growth could be harmed if we lose the services of certain key personnel.

Our success depends to a significant extent on the continued contributions of our key management personnel, including our Chief Executive Officer, Warren Hosseinion, M.D., for the management of our business and implementation of our business strategy. We have entered into employment agreements with Dr. Hosseinion and we hold a $5 million key man life insurance policy. The loss of Dr. Hosseinion or other key management personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our current principal stockholders have significant influence over us and they could delay, deter or prevent a change of control or other business combination or otherwise cause us to take action with which you might not agree. This includes that Warren Hosseinion, M.D. and Adrian Vazquez, M.D., combined currently own more than 40% of our shares and have significant influence over our operations and strategic direction.

Our executive officers and directors, as a group, currently beneficially own approximately 53.1% of our outstanding common stock and together, with the holders of greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock, currently beneficially own approximately 67.2% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, our executive officers, directors and holders of greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock will have the ability to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including:

This concentration of ownership of shares of our common stock could delay or prevent proxy contests, mergers, tender offers, open market purchase programs or other purchases of shares of our common stock that might otherwise give you the opportunity to realize a premium over the then prevailing market price of our common stock. The individual interests of our executive officers, directors and holders of greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock may not always coincide with the interests of the other holders of our common stock. This concentration of ownership may also adversely affect our stock price.

The concentration of ownership includes that Dr. Hosseinion (who currently owns approximately 22% of our shares) and Dr. Vazquez (who currently owns approximately 18% of our shares) together currently own over 40% of our shares of common stock and exert a significant degree of influence over our management and affairs and over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. As stockholders Dr. Hosseinion and Dr. Vazquez are entitled to vote their shares in their own interests, which may not always be in the interests of our stockholders generally. Their concentrated holding of such a significant block of shares may harm the value of our shares and discourage investors from being involved in our Company. They could also use their concentrated holdings to delay, defer, or prevent a change of control, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of our assets that our other stockholders support, or conversely this concentrated control could result in the consummation of such a transaction that our other stockholders do not support.

If our agreements or arrangements with Dr. Hosseinion or physician groups are deemed invalid under state law, including laws against the corporate practice of medicine, or federal law, or are terminated as a result of changes in state law, it could have a material impact on our profitability.

There are various state laws regulating the corporate practice of medicine which prohibit us from owning various health care entities. These corporate practice of medicine prohibitions are intended to prevent unlicensed persons from interfering with or inappropriately influencing the physician’s professional judgment. These and other laws may also prevent fee-splitting, which is the sharing of professional service income with non-professional or business interests. The interpretation and enforcement of these laws vary significantly from state to state. As a result, we have structured other agreements and arrangements with these entities, which may not be as effective in providing control as direct ownership. If those agreements and arrangements were held to be invalid under state laws prohibiting the corporate practice of medicine, a significant portion of our revenues could be affected, which may result in a material adverse effect upon our Company. Further, changes to federal or state law that made regulated or prohibited such agreements or arrangements could also have a material adverse effect upon our profitability and operations.

We rely on certain key affiliated entities that are owned by key personnel who could stop services to our Company. Any failure by our key affiliated entities or their equity holders to perform their obligations under the contractual arrangements would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also own the majority, and not all, of the equity of our key subsidiaries.

We consolidate in our financial reporting and business structure various affiliated physician practice groups. If we had direct ownership of certain of our affiliated entities, we would be able to exercise our rights as an equity holder directly to effect changes in the boards of directors of those entities, which could effect changes at the management and operational level. Under our contractual arrangements, we may not be able to directly change the members of the boards of directors of these entities and would have to rely on the entities and the entities’ equity holders to perform their obligations in order to exercise our control over the entities. If any of these affiliated entities or their equity holders fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements.

Further, many of those entities are either wholly-owned or primarily owned by Dr. Hosseinion. If Dr. Hosseinion died, was incapacitated or otherwise was no longer affiliated with our Company there could be a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, MMG and other affiliated medical physician practice groups are or may be owned by other medical doctors who could also die, become incapacitated or otherwise become no longer affiliated with our Company, which might have a material adverse effect on our business. Although the terms of the contractual agreements provide that they will be binding on the successors of the entities’ equity holders, as those successors are not a party to the agreements, it is uncertain whether the successors in case of the death, bankruptcy or divorce of an equity holder will be subject to or will be willing to honor the obligations of such agreements.

In addition, although we consolidate in our financial reporting and business structure ApolloMed ACO and ApolloMed Palliative, individuals other than Dr. Hosseinion also own approximately 30% of the equity of ApolloMed ACO and 49% of the equity in ApolloMed Palliative.

ApolloMed’s operations are dependent on a few payors.

The Company had one payor during the three months ended December 31, 2014 that accounted for 16.9% of net revenues and had three payors during the three months ended December 31, 2013 which contributed 15.2%, 14.8% and 14.3% of net revenues, respectively. During the nine months ended December 31, 2014, the Company had one payor that accounted for 33.9% of net revenues. The Company had three payors during the nine months ended December 31, 2013 which contributed 15.9%, 15.5% and 15.2% of net revenues, respectively. Historically the Company has had a few payors that have generated a large portion of the Company’s revenues. The Company believes that, going forward, a substantial portion of its revenue could be derived from a select few payors. Each payor may immediately terminate any of our contracts or any individual credentialed physician upon the occurrence of certain events. They may also amend the material terms of the contracts under certain circumstances. Failure to maintain the contracts on favorable terms, for any reason, would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. A material decline in the number of patients we serve could also have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

ApolloMed ACO may not generate savings through its participation in the Medicare Shared Savings Program, and any revenue generated by such participation will be periodic and will occur, if at all, on an annual basis. The payment of the awards could happen irregularly.

The Company, through its subsidiary ApolloMed ACO, participates in the MSSP sponsored by the CMS. The MSSP allows ACO participants to share in cost savings that are generated in connection with rendering medical services to Medicare patients. Payments to ACO participants, if any, are calculated annually by CMS on cost savings generated by the ACO participant relative to the ACO participants trailing medical service history. The MSSP is a newly formed program with minimal history of payments to ACO participants. As a result of the uncertain nature of the MSSP program, the Company considers revenue, if any, under the MSSP, as contingent upon the realization of program savings as determined by CMS, and revenues are not considered earned and therefore are not recognized until notice from CMS that cash payments are to be imminently received.

During the nine month period ended December 31, 2014, the Company was awarded approximately a $5.4 million payment related to savings achieved from July 1, 2012, through December 31, 2013, for its participation in the MSSP sponsored by the CMS, which represented 23.0% of our net revenue during the nine months ended December 31, 2014. Since payments, if any, are made on an annual basis, the Company will not receive such payments during each quarter, and consequently, revenue may be materially lower in quarters when MSSP related payments are not received. In addition, there is no assurance that the Company will meet the conditions necessary for receipt of future payments. Further, the Company’s ability to continue to generate savings for the MSSP program depends on many factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, including, among others, how the CMS elects to administer the MSSP program, how savings levels are calculated and continued political support of the MSSP program. As a result, whether future revenues will be earned by ApolloMed ACO is uncertain, and, if such amounts are payable, they will be paid on an annual basis significantly after the time earned, and will be contingent on various factors, including whether savings were determined to be achieved in 2014 or in any other period during which savings are measured.

Risk-sharing arrangements that Maverick Medical Group, Inc. has with health plans and hospitals could result in their costs exceeding the corresponding revenues, which could reduce or eliminate any shared risk profitability. Maverick Medical Group, Inc. also has two key contracts with Prospect Medical Group (“PMG”) and its management service organization, which if terminated could materially affect our business.

MMG’s agreements with health plans contain risk-sharing arrangements under which MMG can earn additional compensation from the health plans by coordinating the provision of quality, cost-effective healthcare to members. However, such arrangements may require the physician group to assume a portion of any loss sustained from these arrangements, thereby adversely affecting our consolidated results of operations. Under these risk-sharing arrangements, MMG is responsible for a portion of the cost of hospital services or other services that are not capitated. The terms of the particular risk-sharing arrangement allocate responsibility to the respective parties when the cost of services exceeds the related revenue, which results in a deficit, or permit the parties to share in any surplus amounts when actual costs are less than the related revenue. The amount of non-capitated medical and hospital costs in any period could be affected by factors beyond the control of MMG, such as changes in treatment protocols, new technologies, longer lengths of stay by the patient, and inflation. To the extent that such non-capitated medical and hospital costs are higher than anticipated, revenue may not be sufficient to cover the risk-sharing deficits the health plans and MMG are responsible for, which could reduce our revenues and income.

MMG has further entered into a contract with PMG’s management service organization (“PMSO”) that has a term through September 28, 2020 and automatically renews unless either party provides notice, pursuant to which, among other services, PMSO provides claims processing, authorizations and credentialing for certain physicians. Additionally, under another contract with PMG that has a term through September 28, 2015 and automatically renews unless either party provides notice, MMG accesses some health plan contracts by using PMG as the risk-bearing contracting party with those health plans. Any disruption or change in the condition of PMG’s operations, or any changes to our contracts with PMSO or PMG, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Economic conditions or changing consumer preferences could adversely impact our business.

A downturn in economic conditions in one or more of the Company’s markets could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, business and prospects. Historically, state budget limitations have resulted in reduced state spending. Given that Medicaid is a significant component of state budgets, a downturn would put continued cost containment pressures on Medicaid outlays for our services in California and the other states in which we operate. In addition, an economic downturn, coupled with sustained unemployment, may also impact the number of enrollees in managed care programs as well as the profitability of managed care companies, which could result in reduced reimbursement rates.

The existing federal deficit, as well as deficit spending by the government as the result of adverse developments in the economy or other reasons, can lead to continuing pressure to reduce government expenditures for other purposes, including government-funded programs in which we participate, such as Medicare and Medicaid. Such actions in turn may adversely affect our results of operations.

Although we attempt to stay informed of government and customer trends, any sustained failure to identify and respond to trends could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, business and prospects.

The Company’s success depends upon the ability to adapt to a changing market and continued development of additional services.

Although we expect to provide a broad and competitive range of services, there can be no assurance of acceptance by the marketplace. The procurement of new contracts by the Company may be dependent upon the continuing results achieved at the current facilities, upon pricing and operational considerations, as well as the potential need for continuing improvement to existing services. Moreover, the markets for such services may not develop as expected nor can there be any assurance that we will be successful in our marketing of any such services.

Competition for physicians is intense, and we may not be able to hire and retain physicians to provide services.

We are dependent on our affiliated physicians to provide services and generate revenue. We compete with many types of healthcare providers, including teaching, research and government institutions, hospitals and other practice groups, for the services of clinicians. The limited number of residents entering the job market each year and the limited number of other licensed providers seeking to change employers makes it challenging to meet our hiring needs and may require us to contract locum tenens physicians or to increase physician compensation in a manner that decreases our profit margins. The limited number of residents and other licensed providers also impacts our ability to recruit new physicians with the expertise necessary to provide services within our business and our ability to renew contracts with existing physicians on acceptable terms. If we do not do so, our ability to provide services could be adversely affected. Our physician turnover rate has remained stable over the last three years. If the turnover rate were to increase significantly, our growth could be impeded.

Moreover, unlike some of our competitors who sometimes pay additional compensation to physicians who agree to provide services exclusively to that competitor, our IPAs have historically not entered into such exclusivity agreements and have allowed our affiliated physicians to affiliate with multiple IPAs. This practice may place us at a competitive disadvantage regarding the hiring and retention of physicians relative to those competitors who do enter into such exclusivity agreements.

The healthcare industry continues to experience shortages in qualified service employees and management personnel, and we may be unable to hire qualified employees.

We compete with other healthcare providers for our employees, both clinical associates and management personnel. As the demand for health services continues to exceed the supply of available and qualified staff, we and our competitors have been forced to offer more attractive wage and benefit packages to these professionals. Furthermore, the competition for this shrinking labor market has created turnover as many seek to take advantage of the supply of available positions, each offering new and more attractive wage and benefit packages. In addition to the wage pressures described above, the cost of training new employees amid the turnover rates may cause added pressure on our operating margins. Lastly, the market for qualified nurses and therapists is highly competitive, which may adversely affect our home health and hospice operations, which are particularly dependent on nurses for patient care.

The health care industry is competitive.

There are other companies and individuals currently providing health care services. We compete directly with national, regional and local providers of inpatient healthcare for patients and physicians. Other companies could enter the market in the future and divert some or all of our business. On a national basis, our competitors include, but are not limited to, Team Health, EmCare, DaVita HealthCare Partners and Heritage Provider Network, each of which may have greater financial and other resources available to them. We also compete with physician groups and privately-owned health care companies in each of our local markets. Existing or future competitors also may seek to compete with us for acquisitions, which could have the effect of increasing the price and reducing the number of suitable acquisitions, which would have an adverse impact on our growth strategy. Since there are virtually no capital expenditures required to enter the industry, there are few financial barriers to entry. Individual physicians, physician groups and companies in other healthcare industry segments, including hospitals with which we have contracts, some of which have greater financial, marketing and staffing resources, may become competitors in providing health care services, and this competition may have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial position. In addition, certain governmental payors contract for services with independent providers such that our relationships with these payors are not exclusive, particularly in California.

Further, as we have expanded into palliative, home health and hospice care through the launch of ApolloMed Palliative, we face competitors that have traditionally concentrated in this segment and that may have greater resources and specialized expertise than us. In many areas in which our palliative, home health and hospice care programs are located, we compete with a large number of organizations, including:

We may be unable to successfully compete with these competitors in palliative, home health and hospice care, and may expend significant resources without success.

We are reliant on referrals from third parties for our services.

Our business is reliant on referrals from third parties for our services. We receive referrals from community medical providers, emergency departments, payors, and hospitals in the same manner as other medical professionals receive patient referrals. We do not provide compensation or other remuneration to our referral sources for referring patients to us. A decrease in these referrals due to competition, concerns about the quality of our services, and other factors could result in a significant decrease in our revenues and adversely impact our financial condition. Similarly, we cannot assure that we will be able to obtain or maintain preferred provider status with significant third-party payors in the communities where we operate. If we are unable to maintain our referral base or our preferred provider status with significant third-party payors, it may negatively impact our revenues and our financial performance.

Hospitals and other inpatient and post-acute care facilities (collectively “facilities”) may terminate their agreements with us or reduce the fees they pay us.

We currently derive approximately 15% of our net revenue for physician services from contracts directly with facilities. Our current partner facilities may decide not to renew our contracts, introduce unfavorable terms, or reduce fees paid to us. Any of these events may impact the ability of our practice groups to operate at such facilities, which would negatively impact our revenue and profitability.

Some of the hospitals where our affiliated physicians provide services may have their medical staff closed to non-contracted physicians.

In general, our affiliated physicians may only provide services in a hospital where they have certain credentials, called privileges, which are granted by the medical staff and controlled by legally binding medical staff bylaws of the hospital. The medical staff decides who will receive privileges, and the medical staff of the hospitals where we currently provide services or wish to provide services could decide that non-contracted physicians can no longer receive privileges to practice there. Such a decision would limit our ability to furnish services in a hospital, decrease the number of our affiliated physicians who could provide services, or preclude us from entering new hospitals. In addition, hospitals may attempt to enter into exclusive contracts for physician services, which would reduce access to certain populations of patients within the hospital.

We may have difficulty collecting payments from third-party payors in a timely manner.

We derive significant revenue from third-party payors, and delays in payment or audits leading to refunds to payors may impact our net revenue. In particular, we rely on some key governmental payors. We assume the financial risks relating to uncollectible and delayed payments. Governmental payors typically pay on a more extended payment cycle, which could result in our incurring expenses prior to receiving corresponding revenue. In the current healthcare environment, payors are continuing their efforts to control expenditures for healthcare, including proposals to revise coverage and reimbursement policies. We may experience difficulties in collecting our revenue because third-party payors may seek to reduce or delay payment to which we believe we are entitled. If we are not paid fully and in a timely manner for such services or there is a finding that we were incorrectly paid, our revenues, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Our business model depends on numerous complex management information systems, and any failure to successfully maintain these systems or implement new systems could undermine our ability to receive ACO payments and otherwise materially harm our operations and result in potential violations of healthcare laws and regulations.

We depend on a complex, specialized, integrated management information system and standardized procedures for operational and financial information, as well as for our billing operations. We may be unable to enhance our existing management information systems or implement new management information systems where necessary. Additionally, we may experience unanticipated delays, complications, or expenses in implementing, integrating, and operating our systems. Our management information systems may require modifications, improvements, or replacements that may require both substantial expenditures as well as interruptions in operations. Our ability to implement these systems is subject to the availability of information technology and skilled personnel to assist us in creating and implementing these systems. Our failure to successfully implement and maintain all of our systems could undermine our ability to receive ACO payments and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, our failure to successfully operate our billing systems could lead to potential violations of healthcare laws and regulations.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal controls, and we cannot provide assurances that these weaknesses will be effectively remediated or that additional material weaknesses will not occur in the future. If our internal control over financial reporting or our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, prevent fraud, or file our periodic reports in a timely manner, which may cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and may lead to a decline in our stock price.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. We have identified a number of material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures. These material weaknesses could allow the reporting of inaccurate or incomplete information regarding our business in our public filings and will require the Company to devote substantial resources to mitigating and resolving the weaknesses we have identified.

Additionally, we intend to continue to grow our business through the acquisition of new entities. When we acquire such existing entities our due diligence may fail to discover defects or deficiencies in the design and operations of the internal controls over financial reporting of such entities, or defects or deficiencies in the internal controls over financial reporting may arise when we try to integrate the operations of these newly acquired companies with our own. We can provide no assurances that we will not experience such issues in future acquisitions, the result of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.

The requirements of remaining a public company may strain our resources and distract our management, which could make it difficult to manage our business.

We are required to comply with various regulatory and reporting requirements, including those required by the SEC. Complying with these reporting and other regulatory requirements are time-consuming and expensive and could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may write off intangible assets, such as goodwill.

Our intangible assets are subject to annual impairment testing. Under current accounting standards, goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and we may be subject to impairment losses as circumstances change after an acquisition. If we record an impairment loss related to our goodwill, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for the year in which the impairment is recorded.

ACOs are new and unproven and CMS may discontinue, alter or radically change the MSSP program.

The Company has invested resources in both acquiring the ACO license and in establishing initial infrastructure. The MSSP program and the rules regarding ACO licensing are both new and may be altered in the future. Any material change to the MSSP program and ACO license requirements, governance and operating rules, could provide a significant financial risk for the Company and alter the strategic direction of the Company thereby producing stockholder risk and uncertainty. In addition, the Company could lose its ACO license if it does not comply with the CMS MSSP participation requirements.

The Company currently derives 100% of its revenues in only California.

The Company’s business and operations are primarily in one state, California. While the Company operates through ApolloMed ACO outside of California, it has not derived any revenues from operations outside of California, and, it currently derives all of its revenues from California. Any material changes by California with respect to strategy, taxation and economics of healthcare delivery and reimbursements could produce an adverse effect on the continued business operations of Company.

A prolonged disruption of the capital and credit markets may adversely affect our future access to capital, our cost of capital and our ability to continue operations.

We have relied on the capital and credit markets for liquidity and to execute our business strategies, which include increasing our revenue base through a combination of internal growth and acquisitions. Volatility and disruption of the U.S. capital and credit markets may adversely affect our access to capital and increase our cost of capital. Should current economic and market conditions deteriorate, our ability to finance our ongoing operations and our expansion may be adversely affected, we may be unable to raise necessary funds, our cost of debt or equity capital may increase significantly and future access to capital markets may be adversely affected.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and if we are unable to protect them or are subject to intellectual property rights claims, our business may be harmed.

Our intellectual property rights, including those rights related to our “ApolloMed” unregistered trademark and some other trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets, are important assets for us. We do not hold any patents protecting our intellectual property. Various events outside of our control pose a threat to our intellectual property rights as well as to our business. For example, we may be subject to third-party intellectual property rights claims, and our technologies may not be able to withstand any such claims. Regardless of the merits of the claims, any intellectual property claims could be time-consuming and expensive to litigate or settle. In addition, if any claims against us are successful, we may have to pay substantial monetary damages or discontinue any of our practices that are found to be in violation of another party’s rights. We also may have to seek a license to continue such practices, which may significantly increase our operating expenses or may not be available to us at all. Also, the efforts we have taken to protect our proprietary rights may not be sufficient or effective. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business or our ability to compete.

We attempt to protect our trade secrets and other critical confidential information through contractual agreements, which may be breached.

There are a number of third parties, service providers, and others who have access to our confidential information. While we have attempted to protect this information through confidentiality agreements and other protective arrangements, it is difficult to detect and demonstrate a breach of any of these agreements or arrangements, and our confidential information may be leaked and used by other companies that compete in our industry. Any such use of our information could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future business plans.

Many of our agreements with hospitals and medical groups are relatively short term or may be terminated without cause by providing advance notice, and any such termination could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, operations and future business plans.

Many of our hospitalist and other operating agreements are relatively short term or may be terminated without cause by providing advance notice. If these agreements are terminated at the end of their term, are not renewed or are terminated before the end of their term, we would lose the revenues generated by those agreements. Any such termination could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, operations and future business plans.

Many of our agreements with hospitals and medical groups include prohibitions on our hiring physicians or patients or competing with the hospital or medical group, which limits our ability to implement our business plan in certain areas.

Because many of our hospitalist and other operating agreements include prohibitions on our hiring physicians or patients or competing with the hospital or medical group, our ability to hire physicians, attract patients or conduct business in certain areas may be limited in some cases.

ACO has entered into an agreement with PMG that may limit our ability to sell our ACO operations if we decide to do so.

ACO has entered into an agreement with PMG that prevents ACO from selling its operations without PMG’s having the option to purchase the ACO network of physicians who were contracted with PMG and introduced to ACO by PMG. We estimate that no more than 20 physicians would currently be subject to PMG’s purchase option, which takes effect only if ACO elects to sell its operations. PMG’s option to purchase certain ACO physicians, unless terminated, may limit our ability to sell our ACO operations if we decide to do so.

Risks Related to Healthcare Regulation

The healthcare industry is complex and intensely regulated at the federal, state, and local levels and government authorities may determine that we have failed to comply with applicable laws or regulations.

As a company involved in the provision of healthcare services, we are subject to a myriad of federal, state, and local laws and regulations. There are significant costs involved in complying with these laws and regulations. Moreover, if we are found to have violated any applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to civil and/or criminal damages, fines, sanctions, or penalties, including exclusion from participation in governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. We may also be required to change our method of operations. These consequences could be the result of current conduct or even conduct that occurred a number of years ago. We also could incur significant costs merely if we become the subject of an additional investigation or legal proceeding alleging a violation of these laws and regulations. We cannot predict whether a federal, state, or local government will determine that we are not operating in accordance with law, or whether the laws will change in the future and impact our business. Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of some of the more significant healthcare laws and regulations that affect us:

We cannot predict the effect that the ACA and its implementation may have on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

The ACA was signed into law, in two parts, on March 23, 2010 and March 30, 2010. The ACA dramatically alters the U.S. healthcare system and is intended to decrease the number of uninsured Americans and reduce the overall cost of healthcare. The ACA attempts to achieve these goals by, among other things, requiring most Americans to obtain health insurance, expanding Medicare and Medicaid eligibility, reducing Medicare and Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments to providers, expanding the Medicare program’s use of value-based purchasing programs, tying hospital payments to the satisfaction of quality criteria, bundling payments to hospitals and other providers, and instituting private health insurance reforms. Although a majority of the measures contained in the ACA just recently became effective, some of the reductions in Medicare spending, such as negative adjustments to the Medicare hospital inpatient and outpatient prospective payment system market basket updates and the incorporation of productivity adjustments to the Medicare program’s annual inflation updates, became effective in 2010, 2011 and 2012. Although the expansion of health insurance coverage should increase revenues from providing care to previously uninsured individuals, many of these provisions of the ACA will continue to become effective beyond 2014, and the impact of such expansion may be gradual and may not offset scheduled decreases in reimbursement.

On June 28, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the ACA, including the “individual mandate” provisions of the ACA that generally require all individuals to obtain healthcare insurance or pay a penalty. However, the U.S. Supreme Court also held that the provision of the ACA that authorized the Secretary of HHS to penalize states that choose not to participate in the expansion of the Medicaid program by removing all of their existing Medicaid funding was unconstitutional. In response to the ruling, a number of U.S. governors, including those of some states in which we intend to operate, have stated that they oppose their state’s participation in the expanded Medicaid program, which could result in the ACA not providing coverage to some low-income persons in those states. In addition, several bills have been and may continue to be introduced in Congress to repeal or amend all or significant provisions of the ACA.

The ACA changes how healthcare services are covered, delivered, and reimbursed. The net effect of the ACA on our business is subject to numerous variables, including the law’s complexity, lack of complete implementing regulations and interpretive guidance, gradual and potentially delayed implementation or possible amendment, as well as the uncertainty as to the extent to which states will choose to participate in the expanded.

The Health Care Reform Act also mandates changes specific to home health and hospice benefits under Medicare. For home health, the Health Care Reform Act mandates creation of a value-based purchasing program, development of quality measures, a decrease in home health reimbursement beginning with federal year 2014 that will be phased-in over a four-year period, and a reduction in the outlier cap. In addition, the Health Care Reform Act requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to test different models for delivery of care, some of which would involve home health services. It also requires the Secretary to establish a national pilot program for integrated care for patients with specific conditions, bundling payment for acute hospital care, physician services, outpatient hospital services (including emergency department services), and post-acute care services, which would include home health. The Health Care Reform Act further directs the Secretary to rebase payments for home health, which will result in a decrease in home health reimbursement beginning in 2014 that will be phased-in over a four-year period. The Secretary is also required to conduct a study to evaluate cost and quality of care among efficient home health agencies regarding access to care and treating Medicare beneficiaries with varying severity levels of illness and provide a report to Congress. Beginning October 1, 2012, the annual market basket rate increase for hospice providers was reduced by a formula that caused payment rates to be lower than in the prior year.

Providers in the healthcare industry are the subject of federal and state investigations, as well as payor audits.

Due to our participation in government and private healthcare programs, we are sometimes involved in inquiries, reviews, audits and investigations by governmental agencies and private payors of our business practices, including assessments of our compliance with coding, billing and documentation requirements. Federal and state government agencies have active civil and criminal enforcement efforts that include investigations of healthcare companies, and their executives and managers. Under some circumstances, these investigations can also be initiated by private individuals under whistleblower provisions which may be incentivized by the possibility for private recoveries. The DRA revised federal law to further encourage these federal, state and individually-initiated investigations against healthcare companies.

Responding to these audit and enforcement activities can be costly and disruptive to our business operations, even when the allegations are without merit. If we are subject to an audit or investigation and a finding is made that we were incorrectly reimbursed, we may be required to repay these agencies or private payors, or we may be subjected to pre-payment reviews, which can be time-consuming and result in non-payment or delayed payment for the services we provide. We also may be subject to other financial sanctions or be required to modify our operations.

Controls designed to reduce inpatient services may reduce our revenues.

Controls imposed by Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial third-party payors designed to reduce admissions and lengths of stay, commonly referred to as “utilization review,” have affected and are expected to continue to affect our facilities. Federal law contains numerous provisions designed to ensure that services rendered by hospitals to Medicare and Medicaid patients meet professionally recognized standards and are medically necessary and that claims for reimbursement are properly filed. These provisions include a requirement that a sampling of admissions of Medicare and Medicaid patients must be reviewed by quality improvement organizations, which review the appropriateness of Medicare and Medicaid patient admissions and discharges, the quality of care provided, and the appropriateness of cases of extraordinary length of stay or cost on a post-discharge basis. Quality improvement organizations may deny payment for services or assess fines and also have the authority to recommend to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that a provider which is in substantial noncompliance with the standards of the quality improvement organization be excluded from participation in the Medicare program. The ACA potentially expands the use of prepayment review by Medicare contractors by eliminating statutory restrictions on their use, and, as a result, efforts to impose more stringent cost controls are expected to continue. Utilization review is also a requirement of most non-governmental managed care organizations and other third-party payors. Inpatient utilization, average lengths of stay and occupancy rates continue to be negatively affected by payor-required preadmission authorization and utilization review and by third party payor pressure to maximize outpatient and alternative healthcare delivery services for less acutely ill patients. Although we are unable to predict the effect these controls and changes will have on our operations, significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

Laws regulating the corporate practice of medicine could restrict the manner in which we are permitted to conduct our business and the failure to comply with such laws could subject us to penalties or require a corporate restructuring.

Some states have laws that prohibit business entities from practicing medicine, employing physicians to practice medicine, exercising control over medical decisions by physicians (also known collectively as the corporate practice of medicine) or engaging in some arrangements, such as fee-splitting, with physicians. In some states these prohibitions are expressly stated in a statute or regulation, while in other states the prohibition is a matter of judicial or regulatory interpretation. California is one of the states that prohibit the corporate practice of medicine.

In California, we operate by maintaining contracts with our affiliated physician groups which are each owned and operated by physicians and which employ or contract with additional physicians to provide physician services. Under these arrangements, we provide management services, receive a management fee for providing non-medical management services, do not represent that we offer medical services, and do not exercise influence or control over the practice of medicine by the physicians or the affiliated physician groups.

In addition to the above management arrangements, we have some contractual rights relating to the transfer of equity interests in some of our affiliated physician groups, to a third party designated by us, through Physician Shareholders agreements with Dr. Hosseinion, the controlling equity holder of such affiliated physician groups. However, such equity interests cannot be transferred to or held by us or by any non-professional organization. Accordingly, we do not directly own any equity interests in any physician groups in California. In the event that any of these affiliated physician groups fails to comply with the management arrangement or any management arrangement is terminated and/or we are unable to enforce its contractual rights over the orderly transfer of equity interests in its affiliated physician groups, such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

If there is a change in accounting principles or the interpretation thereof by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), affecting consolidation of entities, it could impact our consolidation of total revenues derived from such affiliated physician groups.

Our financial statements are consolidated and include the accounts of our majority-owned subsidiaries and various non-owned affiliated physician groups that are variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which consolidation is effectuated in accordance with applicable accounting rules. In the event of a change in accounting principles promulgated by FASB or in FASB’s interpretation of its principles, or if there were an adverse determination by a regulatory agency or a court or if there were a change in state or federal law relating to the ability to maintain present agreements or arrangements with such physician groups, we may not be permitted to continue to consolidate the total revenues of such organizations.

Accounting rules require that under some circumstances the VIE consolidation model be applied when a reporting enterprise holds a variable interest (e.g., equity interests, debt obligations, certain management and service contracts) in a legal entity. Under this model, an enterprise must assess the entity in which it holds a variable interest to determine whether it meets the criteria to be consolidated as a VIE. If the entity is a VIE, the consolidation framework next identifies the party, if one exists, that possesses a controlling financial interest in a VIE, and requires that party to consolidate as the primary beneficiary. An enterprise’s determination of whether it has a controlling financial interest in a VIE requires that a qualitative determination be made, and is not solely based on voting rights.

If an enterprise determines the entity in which it holds a variable interest is not subject to the VIE guidance in ASC 810, the enterprise should apply the traditional voting control model (also outlined in ASC 810) which focuses on voting rights. In our case, the VIE consolidation model applies to our controlled, but not owned, physician affiliated entities. Our determination regarding the consolidation of our affiliates could be challenged, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations.

Our developing palliative care business is subject to rules, prohibitions, regulations and reimbursement requirements that differ from those that govern our primary home health and hospice operations.

We continue to develop our palliative care services, which is a type of care focused upon relieving pain and suffering in patients who do not quality for, or who have not yet elected, the hospice benefit. The continued development of this business line exposes us to additional risks, in part because the business line requires us to comply with additional Federal and state laws and regulations that differ from those that govern our home health and hospice business. This line of business requires compliance with different Federal and state requirements governing licensure, enrollment, documentation, prescribing, coding, billing and collection of coinsurance and deductibles, among other requirements. Additionally, some states have prohibitions on the corporate practice of medicine and fee-splitting, which generally prohibit business entities from owning or controlling medical practices or may limit the ability of Clinical Professionals to share professional service income with non-professional or business interests. These requirements may vary significantly from state to state. Reimbursement for palliative care and house calls services is generally conditioned on our clinical professionals providing the correct procedure and diagnosis codes and properly documenting both the service itself and the medical necessity for the service. Incorrect or incomplete documentation and billing information, or the incorrect selection of codes for the level and type of service provided, could result in non-payment for services rendered or lead to allegations of billing fraud. Further, compliance with applicable regulations may cause us to incur expenses that we have not anticipated, and if we are unable to comply with these additional legal requirements, we may incur liability, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our developing palliative care business line is subject to new licensing requirements, which will require us to expend resources to comply with the changing requirements.

In October 2013, California enacted the Home Care Services Consumer Protection Act. The act establishes a licensing program for home care organizations, and requires background checks, basic training, and tuberculosis screening for the aides that are employed by home care organizations. Home care organizations and aides had until January 1, 2015 to comply with the new licensing and background check requirements. Because we operate in California, the requirements of the act are expected to impose additional costs on us.

We do not have a limited Knox-Keene License.

We do not hold a limited Knox-Keene license (a managed care plan license issued pursuant to the California Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975). If the Department of Managed Health Care were to determine that we have been inappropriately taking risk for institutional and professional services as a result of our various hospital and physician arrangements without having a limited Knox-Keene license, we may be required to obtain a limited Knox-Keene license to resolve such violations and we could be subject to civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our revenue may be negatively impacted by the failure of our affiliated physicians to appropriately document services they provide.

We rely upon our affiliated physicians to appropriately and accurately complete necessary medical record documentation and assign appropriate reimbursement codes for their services. Reimbursement to us is conditioned on our affiliated physicians providing the correct procedure and diagnosis codes and properly documenting the services themselves, including the level of service provided, and the medical necessity for the services. If our affiliated physicians have provided incorrect or incomplete documentation or selected inaccurate reimbursement codes, this could result in nonpayment for services rendered or lead to allegations of billing fraud. This could subsequently lead to civil and criminal penalties, including exclusion from government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. In addition, third-party payors may disallow, in whole or in part, requests for reimbursement based on determinations that certain amounts are not covered, services provided were not medically necessary, or supporting documentation was not adequate. Retroactive adjustments may change amounts realized from third-party payors and result in recoupments or refund demands, affecting revenue already received.

Changes associated with reimbursement by third-party payors for the Company’s services may adversely affect operating results and financial condition.

The medical services industry is undergoing significant changes with third-party payors that are taking measures to reduce reimbursement rates or in some cases, denying reimbursement altogether. There is no assurance that third-party payors will continue to pay for the services provided by our affiliated medical groups. Failure of third party payors to adequately cover the medical services so provided by the Company will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, business and prospects.

Compliance with federal and state privacy and information security laws is expensive, and we may be subject to government or private actions due to privacy and security breaches.

We must comply with numerous federal and state laws and regulations governing the collection, dissemination, access, use, security and confidentiality of patient health information (“PHI”), including HIPAA and HITECH. As part of our medical record keeping, third-party billing, and other services, we collect and maintain PHI in paper and electronic format. Therefore, new privacy or security laws, whether implemented pursuant to federal or state action, could have a significant effect on the manner in which we handle healthcare-related data and communicate with payors. In addition, compliance with these standards could impose significant costs on us or limit our ability to offer services, thereby negatively impacting the business opportunities available to us. Despite our efforts to prevent security and privacy breaches, they may still occur. If any non-compliance with existing or new laws and regulations related to PHI results in privacy or security breaches, we could be subject to monetary fines, civil suits, civil penalties or even criminal sanctions.

As a result of the expanded scope of HIPAA through HITECH, we may incur significant costs in order to minimize the amount of “unsecured PHI” we handle and retain or to implement improved administrative, technical or physical safeguards to protect PHI. We may incur significant costs in order to demonstrate and document whether there is a low probability that the PHI has been compromised in order to overcome the presumption that an impermissible use or disclosure of PHI results in a reportable breach. We may incur significant costs to notify the relevant individuals, government entities, and, in some cases, the media, in the event of a breach and to provide appropriate remediation and monitoring to mitigate the possible damage done by any such breach.

Providers must be properly enrolled in governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, before they can receive reimbursement for providing services, and there may be delays in the enrollment process.

Each time a new affiliated physician joins us, we must enroll the affiliated physician under our applicable group identification number for Medicare and Medicaid programs and for certain managed care and private insurance programs before we can receive reimbursement for services the physician renders to beneficiaries of those programs. The estimated time to receive approval for the enrollment is sometimes difficult to predict and, in recent years, the Medicare program carriers often have not issued these numbers to our affiliated physicians in a timely manner. These practices result in delayed reimbursement that may adversely affect our cash flow and revenues.

We may face malpractice and other lawsuits that may not be covered by insurance.

Malpractice lawsuits are common in the healthcare industry. The medical malpractice legal environment varies greatly by state. The status of tort reform, availability of non-economic damages or the presence or absence of other statutes, such as elder abuse or vulnerable adult statutes, influence the incidence and severity of malpractice litigation. We may also be subject to other types of lawsuits which may involve large claims and significant defense costs. Many states have joint and several liability for all healthcare providers who deliver care to a patient and are at least partially liable. As a result, if one healthcare provider is found liable for medical malpractice for the provision of care to a particular patient, all other healthcare providers who furnished care to that same patient, including possibly our affiliated physicians, may also share in the full liability which may be substantial.

We currently maintain malpractice liability insurance coverage to cover professional liability and other claims for certain hospitalists and clinic physicians. All of our physicians are required to carry first dollar coverage with limits of coverage equal to $1,000,000 for all claims based on occurrence up to an aggregate of $3,000,000 per year. We cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be adequate to cover liabilities arising out of claims asserted against us, our affiliated professional organizations or our affiliated physicians, and we cannot provide assurance that any future liabilities will not have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage, including coverage for professional liability and other claims, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, our professional liability insurance coverage generally must be renewed annually and may not continue to be available to us in future years at acceptable costs and on favorable terms.

We have established reserves for potential medical liabilities losses which are subject to inherent uncertainties and a deficiency in the established reserves may lead to a reduction in our net income.

The Company establishes reserves for estimates of incurred but not reported claims (“IBNR”) due to contracted physicians, hospitals, and other professional providers and risk-pool liabilities. IBNR estimates are developed using actuarial methods and are based on many variables, including the utilization of health care services, historical payment patterns, cost trends, product mix, seasonality, changes in membership, and other factors. Many of the medical contracts are complex in nature and may be subject to differing interpretations regarding amounts due for the provision of various services. Such differing interpretations may not come to light until a substantial period of time has passed following the contract implementation. The inherent difficult in interpreting contracts and the estimated level of necessary reserves could result in significant fluctuations in our estimates from period to period. It is possible that actual losses and related expenses may differ, perhaps substantially, from the reserve estimates reflected in our financial statements. If subsequent claims exceed our estimated reserves, we may be required to increase reserves, which would lead to a reduction in our future net income.

Litigation expenses may be material.

In recent periods, we have incurred increased expenses for legal fees, in particular fees related to the defense of the lawsuits by certain competitors that are described under “LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.” While we maintain the insurance coverage described above, such insurance may not cover these lawsuits or some other types of commercial disputes. The defense of litigation, including fees of external legal counsel, expert witnesses and related costs, is expensive and may be difficult to project accurately. In general, such costs are unrecoverable even if we ultimately prevail in litigation, and could represent a significant portion of our limited capital resources. To defend lawsuits, we also find it necessary to divert officers and other employees from their normal business functions to gather evidence, give testimony and otherwise support litigation efforts. We expect to experience higher than normal litigation costs until the lawsuits by our competitor are decided.

If we lose any material litigation, including the litigation described under “LEGAL PROCEEDINGS,” we could face material judgments or awards. The outcome of such actions and proceedings, however, cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows in a future period.

We may also in the future find it necessary to file lawsuits to recover damages or protect our interests. The cost of such litigation could also be significant and unrecoverable, which may also deter us from aggressively pursuing even legitimate claims.

We may be subject to litigation related to the agreements that our IPAs enter into with primary care physicians.

It is common in the medical services industry for primary care physicians to be affiliated with multiple IPAs. Our IPAs often enter into agreements with physicians who are also affiliated with our competitors. However, some of our competitors at times enter into agreements with physicians that require the physician to provide services exclusively to that competitor. Our IPAs often have no knowledge, and no way of knowing, whether a physician seeking to affiliate with us is subject to an exclusivity agreement unless the physician informs us of that agreement. Our IPAs rely on the physicians seeking to affiliate with us to determine whether they are able to enter into the proposed agreement. As described in “LEGAL PROCEEDINGS,” competitors have initiated lawsuits against us based in part on interference with such exclusivity agreements, and may do so in the future.

Changes in the rates or methods of Medicare reimbursements may adversely affect our operations.

In order to participate in the Medicare program, we must comply with stringent and often complex enrollment and reimbursement requirements. These programs generally provide for reimbursement on a fee-schedule basis rather than on a charge-related basis, we generally cannot increase our revenue by increasing the amount we charge for our services. To the extent our costs increase, we may not be able to recover our increased costs from these programs, and cost containment measures and market changes in non-governmental insurance plans have generally restricted our ability to recover, or shift to non-governmental payors, these increased costs. In attempts to limit federal and state spending, there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, a number of proposals to limit or reduce Medicare reimbursement for various services. Our business may be significantly and adversely affected by any such changes in reimbursement policies and other legislative initiatives aimed at reducing healthcare costs associated with Medicare, TRICARE and other government healthcare programs.

Our business also could be adversely affected by reductions in or limitations of reimbursement amounts or rates under these government programs, reductions in funding of these programs or elimination of coverage for certain individuals or treatments under these programs.

Overall payments made by Medicare for hospice services are subject to cap amounts. Total Medicare payments to us for hospice services are compared to the cap amount for the hospice cap period, which runs from November 1 of one year through October 31 of the next year. CMS generally announces the cap amount in the month of July or August in the cap period and not at the beginning of the cap period. We must estimate the cap amount for the cap period before CMS announces the cap amount. If our estimate exceeds the later announced cap amount, we may suffer losses. CMS can also make retroactive adjustments to cap amounts announced for prior cap periods. Payments to us in excess of the cap amount must be returned to Medicare. A second hospice cap amount limits the number of days of inpatient care to not more than 20 percent of total patient care days within the cap period.

As part of its review of the Medicare hospice benefit, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission recommended to Congress in its “Report to Congress: Medicare Payment Policy—March 2009” (the “2009 MedPAC Report”) that Congress direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to change the Medicare payment system for hospice to:

In addition, the Health Care Reform Act includes several provisions that could adversely impact hospice providers, including a provision to reduce the annual market basket update for hospice providers by a productivity adjustment. We cannot predict if the 2009 MedPAC Report recommendation will be enacted, whether any additional healthcare reform initiatives will be implemented, or whether the Health Care Reform Act or other changes in the administration of governmental healthcare programs or interpretations of governmental policies or other changes affecting the healthcare system will adversely affect our revenues. Further, due to budgetary concerns, several states have considered or are considering reducing or eliminating the Medicaid hospice benefit. Reductions or changes in Medicare or Medicaid funding could significantly reduce our net patient service revenue and our profitability.

If we inadvertently employ or contract with an excluded person, we may face government sanctions.

Individuals and entities can be excluded from participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs for violating certain laws and regulations, or for other reasons such as the loss of a license in any state, even if the individual retains other licensure. This means that they (and all others) are prohibited from receiving payment for their services rendered to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries, and if the excluded individual is a physician, all services ordered (not just provided) by such physician are also non-covered and non-payable. Entities which employ or contract with excluded individuals are prohibited from billing the Medicare or Medicaid programs for the excluded individual’s services, and are subject to civil monetary penalties if they do. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (“OIG”) maintains a list of excluded individuals and entities. Although we have instituted policies and procedures through our compliance program to minimize the risks, there can be no assurance that we will not inadvertently hire or contract with an excluded person, or that any of our current employees or contracts will not become excluded in the future without our knowledge. If this occurs, we may be subject to substantial repayments and civil penalties and the hospitals at which we furnish services also may be subject to repayments and sanctions, for which they may seek recovery from us.

We may be impacted by eligibility changes to government and private insurance programs.

Due to potential decreased availability of healthcare through private employers, the number of patients who are uninsured or participate in governmental programs may increase. A shift in payor mix from managed care and other private payors to government payors or the uninsured may result in a reduction in our rates of reimbursement or an increase in our uncollectible receivables or uncompensated care, with a corresponding decrease in our net revenue. Changes in the eligibility requirements for governmental programs also could increase the number of patients who participate in such programs or the number of uninsured patients. Even for those patients who remain with private insurance, changes in those programs could increase patient responsibility amounts, resulting in a greater risk for us of uncollectible receivables. Further, our hospice related business could become subject to “quality star ratings,” and, if sufficient quality is not achieved, reimbursement could be negatively impacted. These factors and events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Federal and state laws may limit our effectiveness at collecting monies owed to us from patients.

We utilize third parties, whom we do not and cannot control, to collect from patients any co-payments and other payments for services that our physicians provide to patients. The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act restricts the methods that third-party collection companies may use to contact and seek payment from consumer debtors regarding past due accounts. State laws vary with respect to debt collection practices, although most state requirements are similar to those under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. If our collection practices or those of our collection agencies are inconsistent with these standards, we may be subject to actual damages and penalties. These factors and events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we are unable to effectively adapt to changes in the healthcare industry, including changes to laws and regulations regarding or affecting healthcare reform or the healthcare industry, our business may be harmed.

Due to the importance of the healthcare industry in the lives of all Americans, federal, state, and local legislative bodies frequently pass legislation and promulgate regulations relating to healthcare reform or that affect healthcare business. It is reasonable to believe that there may be increased federal oversight and regulation of the healthcare industry in the future. We cannot assure you as to the ultimate content, timing or effect of any healthcare reform legislation, nor is it possible at this time to estimate the impact of potential legislation on our business. It is possible that future legislation enacted by Congress or state legislatures could adversely affect our business or could change the operating environment of the hospitals and other facilities where our physicians provide services. It is possible that the changes to the Medicare or other governmental healthcare program reimbursements may serve as precedent to possible changes in other payors’ reimbursement policies in a manner adverse to us. Similarly, changes in private payor reimbursements could lead to adverse changes in Medicare and other governmental healthcare programs which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Further, certain regulations not specifically targeting the health care industry also could have material effects on our operations. For example, the California Finance Lenders Law, Division 9, Sections 22000-22780 of the California Financial Code, could arguably apply to the Company as a result of its various affiliate and subsidiary loans and similar arrangements. If a regulator were to take the position that such loans were covered by the California Finance Lenders Law, we could be subject to regulatory action which could impair our ability to continue to operate and may have a material adverse effect on our profitability and business.

We may incur significant costs to adopt certain provisions under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act.

HITECH was enacted into law on February 17, 2009 as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Among the many provisions of HITECH are those relating to the implementation and use of certified Electronic Health Records (“EHR”). Our patient medical records are maintained and under the custodianship of the healthcare facilities in which we operate. However, to adopt the use of EHRs utilized by these healthcare facilities, determine to adopt certain EHRs, or comply with any related provisions of HITECH, we may incur significant costs which could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial position.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Securities

The market price of our common stock may be volatile, and the value of your investment could decline significantly.

The trading price for our common stock has been, and we expect it to continue to be, volatile. The price at which our common stock trades depends upon a number of factors, including our historical and anticipated operating results, our financial situation, our ability or inability to raise the additional capital we may need and the terms on which we raise it, and general market and economic conditions. Other factors include:

Some of these factors are beyond our control. Broad market fluctuations may lower the market price of our common stock and affect the volume of trading in our stock, regardless of our financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects. If we are successful in uplisting to the Nasdaq Capital Market, we may be covered by more analysts. Our failure to meet their expectations and the projections in their reports could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. There is no assurance that the market price of our shares of common stock will not fall in the future.

If any of our historical offerings or sales of our or our subsidiaries’ or affiliates’ unregistered securities were found to be in violation of the Securities Act or state law, then the securities holders who purchased or received such securities may be able to sue to recover the consideration paid for their securities (or the equivalent value if such shares were issued for services) or for damages.

Historically, we have generally offered and sold our securities and the securities of our subsidiaries and affiliates in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act or other available federal exemptions for offering securities. Similar reliance has been placed on exemptions under state laws from securities registration or qualification requirements. Our historical offerings or sales may not have qualified or met the requirements of any of such federal or state law exemptions due to, among other things, the sophistication of the investors, the adequacy of disclosure, the manner of distribution, or the existence of similar offerings in the past or in the future. If rescission claims were successful, securities holders may be entitled to recover the consideration paid for the securities they purchased with interest thereon (or, to the extent securities were offered for services, the value thereof), or for damages. Furthermore, we could be forced to expend significant time and resources defending actions under these laws, even if we are ultimately successful in any defense.

Investors may experience dilution of their ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of our common stock.

We have issued some of our directors, employees, consultants, lenders and other third parties securities that such parties may exercise or convert into shares of our common stock, which exercise would result in the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders. For example, NNA has the right to exercise upon certain conditions being satisfied the warrants or the convertible note it acquired in connection with the credit and investment agreements we entered into with NNA on March 28, 2014. If NNA exercises such right, we will have to issue additional shares of common stock to NNA, which will dilute the ownership interests of our other stockholders. We will have to issue additional shares of common stock in connection with any conversion of the 9% convertible notes we previously issued. Additionally, we will issue additional shares of common stock to the Underwriter if it exercises its warrants issued as part of this Offering.

Additionally, we may in the future issue additional authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in further dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders. We may also issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for common stock in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, future sales of our securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes. For example, we will have to issue additional shares of common stock to NNA if we fail to comply with NNA’s registration rights.

The future issuance of any such additional shares of common stock may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common stock. There can be no assurance that we will not be required to issue additional shares, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with any capital raising efforts, including at a price (or exercise prices) below the price at which shares of our common stock are currently traded at such time.

Investors may experience dilution of their ownership interests because of certain anti-dilution rights afforded NNA.

The exercise price under the NNA Warrants (defined below in “Our Business - NNA Financing Arrangements”) and the conversion price under the NNA Convertible Note (defined below in “Our Business - NNA Financing Arrangements”) and the number of shares underlying such securities would be adjusted under certain circumstances, resulting in our issuance of additional securities.  This adjustment would be triggered by the issuance of our common stock (or securities issuable into our common stock) at a price per share less than $9.00 per share.  The anti-dilution protections described above do not apply to certain exempt issuances, including the sale of our common stock in a bona fide, firmly underwritten public offering pursuant to a registration statement under the 1933 Act and with a purchase price per share of at least $20.00 (excluding this Offering).  In addition, these adjustments would terminate on the earlier of March 28, 2016 and the Company’s closing of an equity financing yielding gross cash proceeds of at least $2,000,000 (excluding this Offering).  We expect the price of our common stock in this Offering to be less than $9.00 per share, so that this Offering would trigger the adjustments described above. This adjustment would result in potential issuance of additional shares of our common stock and the dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders and purchasers of our common stock in this Offering.

Additionally, we may in the future issue additional authorized but previously unissued equity securities, which may also trigger NNA’s anti-dilution protections, and result in further dilution of the ownership interests of our present stockholders and purchasers of our common stock in this Offering.

You will experience immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book value per share of the common stock you purchase.

Since the price per share of our common stock being offered is higher than the net tangible book value per share of our common stock, you will suffer substantial dilution in the net tangible book value of the common stock you purchase in this Offering. Based on the public offering price of $5.00 (the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB on May 6, 2015) for one share and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock, and after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us, if you purchase shares of common stock and warrants in this Offering, you will suffer immediate and substantial dilution of $3.99 per share in the net tangible book value of the common stock, assuming no exercise of the warrants. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option, or if outstanding options and warrants to purchase our common stock are exercised, you will experience additional dilution. See the section entitled “Dilution” in this prospectus for a more detailed discussion of the dilution you will incur if you purchase common stock in this Offering.

There has been a limited trading market for our common stock to date.

While our common stock is currently quoted on OTC Markets, Inc., the trading volume is limited. We are quoted on the OTCQB under the trading symbol “AMEHD.” It is anticipated that there will continue to be a limited trading market for our common stock on the OTCQB and it is often difficult to obtain accurate price quotes for our stock on the OTCQB. We have been conditionally approved to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and meeting all of the Nasdaq Capital Market listing standards on the date of this Offering.   Although we believe that this Offering and the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market (if we satisfy all applicable conditions) will improve the liquidity of our common stock, our trading volume may not improve, our volatility may not be reduced and our share price may not stabilize. A lack of an active market may impair your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair market value of your shares. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares of capital stock and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies by using common stock as consideration.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future and, consequently, your ability to achieve a return on your investment will depend solely on appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We do not pay dividends on our shares of common stock and intend to retain all future earnings to finance the continued growth and development of our business and for general corporate purposes. In addition, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future payment of cash dividends will depend upon our financial condition, capital requirements, earnings and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.

We have broad discretion in how we use the net proceeds of this Offering, and we may not use these proceeds effectively or in ways with which you agree.

Our management will have broad discretion as to the application of the net proceeds of this Offering and could use them for purposes other than those contemplated at the time of this Offering. Our stockholders may not agree with the manner in which our management chooses to allocate and spend the net proceeds. Moreover, our management may use the net proceeds for corporate purposes that may not yield profitable results or increase the market price of our common stock.

Delaware law and our Certificate of Incorporation could discourage a change in control, or an acquisition of us by a third party, even if the acquisition would be favorable to you, and thereby adversely affect existing stockholders.

The Delaware General Corporation Law contain provisions that may have the effect of making more difficult or delaying attempts by others to obtain control of our Company, even when these attempts may be in the best interests of stockholders. Delaware law imposes conditions on certain business combination transactions with “interested stockholders.” These provisions and others that could be adopted in the future could deter unsolicited takeovers or delay or prevent changes in our control or management, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. These provisions may also limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests.

Our Certificate of Incorporation empowers the Board of Directors to establish and issue a class of preferred stock, and to determine the rights, preferences and privileges of the preferred stock. These provisions give the Board of Directors the ability to deter, discourage or make more difficult a change in control of our company, even if such a change in control could be deemed in the interest of our stockholders or if such a change in control would provide our stockholders with a substantial premium for their shares over the then-prevailing market price for the common stock.

Although we have been conditionally approved, we may not successfully obtain a listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market for our common stock. If we do obtain a listing, we may not be able to comply with continued listing standards.

We have been conditionally approved subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and meeting all of the Nasdaq Capital Market listing standards on the date of this Offering, to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, a national securities exchange. After giving effect to this Offering, we expect to meet, on a pro forma basis, the Nasdaq Capital Market’s minimum initial listing standards, which generally only mandate that we meet certain requirements relating to stockholders’ equity, market capitalization, aggregate market value of publicly held shares and distribution requirements, we cannot assure you that we will be able to meet those initial listing requirements. If the Nasdaq Capital Market does not list our common stock for trading on its exchange, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” Because we expect that our common stock will be listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, such securities will be covered securities. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case. Further, if we were no longer listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, our securities would not be covered securities and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.

Although we have been conditionally approved, we may not successfully obtain a listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market for the warrants to purchase common stock included in this Offering. If we do obtain a listing, we may not be able to comply with continued listing standards.

Although we have been conditionally approved, we may not successfully obtain a listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market for the warrants to purchase common stock included in this Offering. If we do obtain a listing, we may not be able to comply with continued listing standards. We have applied for the warrants being offered in this Offering to be listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. There can be no assurance that we will obtain such a listing. If the warrants are not listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the liquidity of the warrants will be limited. Even if we obtain an initial listing of the warrants on the Nasdaq Capital Market, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to comply with applicable listing standards or that an active trading market will develop.

If our application to uplist is approved, our failure to meet the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market or the OTCQB could result in a delisting of our common stock and warrants, if we do decide to uplist.

If our application to list on the Nasdaq Capital Market is approved, and thereafter we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, such as the corporate governance requirements or the minimum closing bid price requirement, the Nasdaq Capital Market may take steps to delist our common stock and warrants. Such a delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of our common stock and warrants and would impair your ability to sell or purchase our common stock and warrants when you wish to do so. In the event of a delisting, we anticipate that we would take actions to restore our compliance with the Nasdaq Capital Market’s listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our common stock or warrants to remain listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, stabilize our market price, improve the liquidity of our common stock, prevent our common stock from dropping below the Nasdaq Capital Market’s minimum bid price requirement, or prevent future non-compliance with the Nasdaq Capital Market’s listing requirements.

Companies trading on the OTCQB, such as us, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTCQB. If we fail to remain current in our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTCQB. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC, and trading in our securities is very limited, which makes transactions in our common stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our securities.

The SEC has adopted Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, Rule 15g-9 requires:

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, among other things:

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Risks Related to This Offering

The reverse stock split may not increase the market price of our common stock sufficiently for us to meet the minimum listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, in which case this Offering may not be completed.

We effected a one-for-ten reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock prior to this Offering. We expect that the reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock will increase the market price of our common stock so that we will be able to meet the minimum market price requirement of the listing rules of the Nasdaq Capital Market. The effect of a reverse stock split upon the market price of our common stock cannot be predicted, and the results of reverse stock splits by other similar companies has varied. It is possible that the market price of our common stock following the reverse stock split will not increase sufficiently for us to be in compliance with the minimum market price requirement of the Nasdaq Capital Market. Even if we initially meet such price requirements, it is uncertain whether such a price will be sustained. If we are unable to meet the minimum market price requirement, we may be unable to list our shares on the Nasdaq Capital Market, in which case this Offering may not be completed.

The reverse stock split may decrease the liquidity of the shares of our common stock.

The liquidity of the shares of our common stock may be affected adversely by the reverse stock split given the reduced number of shares that will be outstanding following the reverse stock split, especially if the market price of our common stock does not increase as a result of the reverse stock split. In addition, the reverse stock split may increase the number of stockholders who own odd lots (less than 100 shares) of our common stock, creating the potential for such stockholders to experience an increase in the cost of selling their shares and greater difficulty effecting such sales.

Following the reverse stock split, the resulting market price of our common stock may not attract new investors, including institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. Consequently, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not improve.

Although we believe that a higher market price of our common stock may help generate greater or broader investor interest, there can be no assurance that the reverse stock split will result in a share price that will attract new investors, including institutional investors.

Holders of our warrants will have no rights as a common stockholder until such holders exercise their warrants and acquire our common stock.

Until holders of warrants acquire shares of our common stock upon exercise of the warrants, holders of warrants will have no rights with respect to the shares of our common stock underlying such warrants. Upon exercise of the warrants, the holders thereof will be entitled to exercise the rights of a common stockholder only as to matters for which the record date occurs after the exercise date.

The warrants included in this offering may not have any value.

Each warrant has an exercise price of 125% of the offering price per share of common stock, subject to adjustment, will be exercisable at any time and from time to time after the closing date, and will expire five years from the closing date. In the event our common stock price does not exceed the exercise price of the warrants during the period when the warrants are exercisable, the warrants may not have any value.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of the securities offered by this prospectus will be approximately $12.7 million, or approximately $14.8 million if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, assuming the sale by us of up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of common stock at an assumed offering price of $5.00 (the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB on May 6, 2015) for one share and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. In addition, if all of the warrants offered pursuant to this prospectus are exercised in full for cash, we will receive approximately an additional $9,375,000 in cash. However, the warrants contain a cashless exercise provision that permit exercise of warrants on a cashless basis at any time where there is no effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, covering the issuance of the underlying shares.

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of $5.00 (the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB on May 6, 2015) for one share and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock would increase (decrease) the expected net cash proceeds to us from this Offering by approximately $2.8 million, assuming that the number of securities offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and that none of the warrants are exercised and after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Similarly, each 20% increase (decrease) in the assumed number of securities offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) the expected net proceeds to us from this Offering by approximately $2.8 million, assuming a public offering price of $5.00 (the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB on May 6, 2015) for one share and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock remains the same and that none of the warrants are exercised, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. See the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

We intend to use the net proceeds of this Offering for working capital and general corporate purposes, which might include acquisitions or paying off and retiring indebtedness, such as indebtedness related to the NNA financing (including the NNA Convertible Note issued in connection therewith) and the 9% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes. As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot specify with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to us from this Offering. Accordingly, our management will have broad discretion in the application of these proceeds.

The NNA Financing, including the maturity of the debt, the applicable interest rates, and the other material terms and conditions is described below in “Our Business - NNA Financing Arrangements.” The NNA Convertible Note has a fixed interest rate of 8%, is due March 28, 2019, and converts into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion price of $10.00 per share. The 9% senior subordinated convertible notes have a fixed interest rate of 9%, are due February 15, 2016 and convert into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion price of $4.00 per share. We have not yet made a determination regarding how much, if any, of the net proceeds of this Offering will be used to pay off or retire indebtedness.

This expected use of net proceeds from this Offering represents our intentions based upon our current plans and business conditions. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly depending on numerous factors, including the progress of our acquisition efforts, and any unforeseen cash needs. As a result, our management will retain broad discretion over the allocation of the net proceeds from this Offering. In addition, our planned use of proceeds does not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments that we may make. We may find it necessary or advisable to use the net proceeds from this Offering for other purposes, and we will have broad discretion in the application of net proceeds from this Offering.

DIVIDEND POLICY

Historically, we have never paid dividends on our common stock, and we currently do not intend to pay any dividends on our common stock after the completion of this Offering. Additionally, under current financing arrangements with NNA we are prohibited from paying dividends. Unless we fully pay-off the obligations associated with such financing arrangements, we will not be able to pay dividends. We currently plan to retain any earnings to support the operation and growth of our business rather than to pay cash dividends. Payments of any cash dividends in the future will depend on our financial condition, results of operations and capital requirements as well as other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive only such dividends (cash or otherwise) as may be declared by our Board of Directors.

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2014, our cash and cash equivalents, long-term debt and our unaudited capitalization on an actual basis and on an as adjusted basis to give effect to this Offering and the application of the net proceeds of this Offering, as described under “Use of Proceeds.”

You should read this table in conjunction with our December 31, 2014 unaudited consolidated financial statements, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus.

(1) Assumes that the securities are sold in this Offering, we sell to the underwriter a share of our common stock and a warrant to purchase one-half share of our common stock at an assumed price of $5.00 (the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB on May 6, 2015) for one share and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock, and that the net proceeds thereof are approximately $12.7 million after underwriter’s discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. The number of shares outstanding excludes those securities excluded from the calculation of dilution in “Dilution” below.

(2) Please see notes 6 and 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2014, for a breakdown of notes and our line of credit payable.

DILUTION

Our as adjusted net tangible book value as of December 31, 2014, was $(4.8) million, or $(0.98) per share of common stock. As adjusted net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the sum of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding, as of December 31, 2014.

After giving effect to this Offering and the receipt of $12.7 million of estimated net proceeds from this Offering (assuming no exercise of the warrant), the as adjusted net tangible book value of our common stock as of December 31, 2014 would have been $7.9 million, or $1.01 per share. This amount represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $1.99 per share to the existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $(3.99) per share to purchasers of our common stock in this Offering. Dilution is determined by subtracting as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this Offering from the amount of cash paid by a new investor for a share of common stock. The new investors will have paid $5.00 for one share of our common stock and one warrant to purchase one-half share of our common stock, even though the per share value of our assets after subtracting our liabilities is only $1.01. The following table illustrates such dilution on a per share basis:

The information in the table above is based on 4,863,455 shares of our common stock outstanding on December 31, 2014, and does not include:

If the underwriter exercises its over-allotment option in full, the as adjusted net tangible book value per share after the Offering would be $10.2 million, or $1.22 per share. This amount represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $2.20 per share to the existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $(3.78) per share to purchasers of our common stock in this Offering.

The number of shares of common stock issuable on exercise of the NNA Warrants and conversion of the NNA Convertible Note is subject to adjustment if the Offering is completed at a price per share less than $9.00. Assuming that, in this Offering, we sell to the underwriter a share of our common stock and a warrant to purchase one-half share of our common stock at an assumed price of $5.00 (the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB on May 6, 2015) for one share and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock, the number of outstanding shares of our common stock, not including the conversion or exercise of any notes, warrants or options not held by NNA, would increase by 566,667 shares (rounded to the nearest whole share), for a total, including the shares issued in this Offering, of 8.4 million shares of our common stock outstanding (assuming no exercise of the over-allotment). After taking into account these additional outstanding shares and the shares issued in the Offering (and assuming no exercise of the over-allotment), the as adjusted net tangible book value per share after the Offering would be $7.9 million, or $0.94 per share. This amount represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $1.92 per share to the existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $4.06 per share to purchasers of our common stock in this Offering.

The following table summarizes, on an as adjusted basis as of December 31, 2014, the differences between the number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration and the average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by investors participating in this offering, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, at an assumed public offering price of $5.00 (the closing price of our common stock on the OTCQB on May 6, 2015) as shown on the cover page of this prospectus.

If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares from us in full, the number of shares held by new investors will increase to 3,450,000, or 41% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding after this Offering and the shares held by existing stockholders will be 4,863,455 but the percentage of shares held by existing stockholders will decrease to 59% of the total shares outstanding.

To the extent that the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised or any warrants or options are exercised, there will be further dilution to new investors.

MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON

COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol, “AMEHD,” and we have received conditional approval to list our common stock and warrants on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols “AMEH” and “AMEHW”, respectively, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and meeting all of the Nasdaq Capital Market listing standards on the date of this Offering.

The following table sets forth, during the fiscal quarters presented, the high and low bid prices of our common stock as reported by the OTCQB. On May 16, 2014, the Board of Directors of our Company approved a change to the Company's fiscal year end from January 31 to March 31. For continuity of reporting our stock price, we reflected fiscal quarters in the following table based on our current March 31 fiscal year-end and without adjustment for our reverse stock split. The OTC market quotations below reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

On May 5, 2015, the closing price of our common stock as quoted on OTCQB was $6.94. This amount reflects a one-for-ten (1:10) reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock that we effected on April 24, 2015.

Reverse Stock Split

On September 12, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a reverse stock split of our outstanding shares of common stock by a ratio of not less than one-for-five (1:5) and not greater than one-for-thirty (1:30), with the exact reverse split ratio and effective date to be decided and publicly announced by the Board of Directors prior to the effective time of the reverse stock split amendment and following stockholder approval. The stockholders approved the stock split at the annual meeting of the Company on September 30, 2014. We effected a one-for-ten (1:10) reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock on April 24, 2015, which is not reflected in the table above. The reverse stock split does not have any effect on our authorized capital stock.

Holders

As of May 5, 2015, we had approximately 348 holders of our common stock.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH

ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Effective on May 12, 2014, the Company’s principal accountant, Kabani & Company, Inc. (“Kabani”), was dismissed as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Kabani’s issued report on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2014, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. Kabani’s issued report on the Company's financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013, did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and was prepared using U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The Company’s decision to change accountants was recommended and approved by the Board of Directors on May 12, 2014.

In connection with the audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements for the years ended January 31, 2014, and 2013, and through the subsequent interim period preceding the dismissal of Kabani, there were no disagreements with Kabani on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of Kabani, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its report.

There were no reportable events as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K in connection with the dismal of Kabani.

Effective on May 12, 2014, the Board of Directors recommended, approved and directed the selection of BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”) as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm.

During the two most recent fiscal years ended January 31, 2014 and 2013, and the subsequent interim period prior to the engagement of BDO, neither the Company, nor anyone on its behalf, consulted BDO regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, where either a written report was provided to the Company or oral advice was provided, that BDO concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HEART CENTERS

The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2014, and as of and for the period from April 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, included in this filing are based upon the respective financial statements of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. (“the Company”) and Southern California Heart Center (“SCHC”). SCHC has a fiscal year end of December 31, and for purposes of this pro forma presentation, these financial statements have been consolidated with Apollo’s January 31, 2014 year end. On May 16, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a change to the Company's fiscal year end from January 31 to March 31. As the March 31, 2014 results comprise only 2 months which is less than full fiscal year, the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations is presented for the year ended January 31, 2014 and for the period from April 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet is not presented as the balance sheet of SCHC is included in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance as filed in its December 31, 2014 Form 10-Q. The unaudited pro forma statement of operations for the year ended January 31, 2014 and for the period from April 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 give effect to the SCHC acquisition as if it occurred on February 1, 2013. The historical financial information is adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements to only give effect to pro forma events that are (1) directly attributable to the acquisition; (2) factually supportable; and (3) with respect to the statement of operations, expected to have a continuing impact on the consolidated results of Apollo and SCHC. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements presented below and with the separate historical financial statements of Apollo and SCHC.

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements are based on estimates and assumptions and are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what the consolidated Company’s results of operations actually would have been had the acquisition been completed as of the dates indicated. Additionally, the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information are not necessarily indicative of the condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations in future periods or the results that actually would have been realized if the acquisition had been completed as of the dates indicated.

The unaudited pro forma adjustments related to the acquisition have been prepared using the acquisition method of accounting under existing U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which are subject to change and interpretation and are based on a preliminary purchase consideration allocation. The allocation of purchase consideration for acquisitions requires extensive use of accounting estimates, assumptions and judgments to allocate the purchase consideration to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their respective estimated fair values.

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements do not reflect the realization of any potential operating synergies or savings or other operational improvements, if any, that the consolidated company may achieve as a result of the acquisition, the costs to integrate the operations of Apollo and SCHC on or the costs necessary to achieve potential operating synergies and revenue enhancements. No assurance can be given that cost saving synergies will be realized.

The pro forma adjustments to SCHC’s assets and liabilities and allocation of purchase consideration are based on Apollo’s preliminary estimates of the fair value of the assets to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed. Apollo made estimates of fair value of SCHC on assets acquired and liabilities assumed using reasonable assumptions based on historical experience and information obtained from SCHC’s management.

APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

For the year ended January 31, 2014

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.

APOLLO MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

For the period from April 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014

See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 1 – Description of Transaction

Pursuant to the terms of that certain Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2014 (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among SCHC, which provides professional medical services in Los Angeles County, California the shareholders of SCHC (the “Sellers”) and a Company affiliate, SCHC Acquisition, A Medical Corporation (“Affiliate”), which was solely owned by Dr. Warren Hosseinion, Apollo’s Chief Executive Officer, Affiliate acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of SCHC. AMM contemporaneously entered into a management services agreement with the Affiliate on the Closing Date, and as a result of the Affiliate’s merger with and into SCHC on the Closing Date, SCHC became the counterparty to this management services agreement and is bound by its terms. Because AMM will manage all non-medical services for SCHC and will have exclusive authority over all non-medical decision making related to the ongoing business operations of SCHC, AMM is the primary beneficiary of SCHC, and its financial statements will be consolidated as a variable interest entity with those of the Company from Closing Date. Accordingly, the Company was the accounting acquirer for purposes of this transaction (“Purchaser”).

The purchase price for the shares was (i) $2,000,000 in cash, (ii) $428,391 to pay off and discharge certain indebtedness of SCHC, (iii) warrants to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share, and (iv) a contingent amount of up to $1,000,000 payable, if at all, in cash.

Note 2 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 31, 2014, and for the period from April 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, included in this filing are based upon the respective financial statements of Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. (the Company or Apollo, as restated) and Southern California Heart Center (SCHC). SCHC has a fiscal year end of December 31, and for purposes of this pro forma presentation, these financial statements have been consolidated with Apollo’s January 31, 2014 year end. On May 16, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a change to the Company's fiscal year end from January 31 to March 31. As the March 31, 2014 results comprise only 2 months which is less than full fiscal year, the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations is presented for the year ended January 31, 2014 and for the period from April 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. The unaudited pro forma statement of operations for the year ended January 31, 2014 and for the period from April 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 give effect to the SCHC acquisition as if it occurred on February 1, 2013. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information was prepared were prepared under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and based on a preliminary purchase price allocation.

The acquisition is accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805,  Business Combinations.

Note 3 – Accounting Policies

As a result of the continuing review of SCHC’s accounting policies, Apollo may identify differences between the accounting policies of the two companies that, when conformed, could have a material impact on the pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 – Purchase Price

The total consideration paid by Apollo on the closing date of July 21, 2014 consisted of cash consideration of $2,428,391 and 100,000 warrants to acquire common shares of Apollo common stock for $10.00 per share with a fair value of $132,000 and is included in the total consideration paid.

The Company also assumed a note payable to a financial institution of $463,582 at the Closing Date, which it repaid in September 2014 and is included in the total consideration paid.

Note 5 – Unaudited Pro Forma Adjustments

Pro forma adjustments are necessary to reflect the total purchase price, to reflect amounts related to SCHC’s net tangible and intangible assets at an amount equal to the estimated fair values on the closing date, and to reflect changes in amortization expense resulting from the preliminarily estimated fair value adjustments to net intangible assets. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements presented below and with the separate historical financial statements of Apollo and SCHC.

Adjustments included in the column under the heading “Pro Forma Adjustments” represent the following:

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following management’s discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes which have been included in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our business and operations. Our actual results may differ materially from those we currently anticipate as a result of the factors we describe under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. In the following discussion we discuss the nine month periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the two month periods ended March 31, 2014, and 2013, and the fiscal years ended January 31, 2014, and 2013.

Reference is made to our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the former year ended January 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 8, 2014, as restated as of April 24, 2015, and included in this prospectus. On May 16, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a change to the Company's fiscal year end from January 31 to March 31. The March 31, 2014 amounts included in the accompanying discussions and related notes thereto are unaudited.

Overview

ApolloMed is a patient-centered, physician-centric integrated healthcare delivery company with a management team with over a decade of experience working at providing coordinated, outcomes-based medical care in a cost-effective manner. ApolloMed has built a company and culture that is focused on physicians providing high quality care, population management and care coordination for patients, particularly for senior patients and patients with multiple chronic conditions. We believe that ApolloMed is well-positioned to take advantage of changes in the U.S. healthcare industry as there is a growing national movement towards more results-oriented healthcare centered on the triple aim of patient satisfaction, high-quality care and cost efficiency.

ApolloMed operates in one reportable segment, the healthcare delivery segment, and implements and operates innovative health care models to create a patient-centered, physician-centric experience. Accordingly, we report our consolidated financial statements in the aggregate, including all of our activities in one reportable segment. ApolloMed has the following integrated, synergistic operations:

Our revenue streams are diversified among our various operations and contract types, and include:

ApolloMed serves Medicare, Medicaid, HMO and uninsured patients primarily in California, as well as in Mississippi and Ohio (where our ACO has recently begun operations). We primarily provide services to patients that are covered by private or public insurance, although we do derive a small portion of our revenue from non-insured patients. We provide care coordination services to each major constituent of the healthcare delivery system, including patients, families, primary care physicians, specialists, acute care hospitals, alternative sites of inpatient care, physician groups and health plans.

Our mission is to transform the delivery of healthcare services in the communities we serve by implementing innovative population health models and creating a patient-centered, physician-centric experience in a high performance environment of integrated care.

The original business owned by ApolloMed was ApolloMed Hospitalists (“AMH”), a hospitalist company, which was incorporated in California in June, 2001 and which began operations at Glendale Memorial Hospital. Through a reverse merger, ApolloMed became a publicly held company in June 2008. ApolloMed was initially organized around the admission and care of patients at inpatient facilities such as hospitals. We have grown our inpatient strategy in a competitive market by providing high-quality care and innovative solutions for our hospital and managed care clients. In 2012, ApolloMed formed an ACO, ApolloMed ACO, and an IPA, MMG, and in 2013 we expanded our service offering to include integrated inpatient and outpatient services through MMG. In 2014, ApolloMed added several complementary operations by acquiring an IPA and outpatient primary care and specialty clinics, as well as hospice/palliative care and home health entities.

ApolloMed’s physician network consists of hospitalists, primary care physicians and specialist physicians primarily through the Company’s owned and affiliated physician groups. ApolloMed operates through the following subsidiaries: AMM, PCCM, VMM and ApolloMed ACO. Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, AMM, ApolloMed manages affiliated medical groups, which consist of AMH, ACC, MMG, AKM and SCHC. Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, PCCM, ApolloMed manages LALC, and through its wholly-owned subsidiary VMM, ApolloMed manages Hendel. ApolloMed also has a controlling interest in ApolloMed Palliative, which owns two Los Angeles-based companies, Best Choice Hospice Care LLC and Holistic Health Home Health Care Inc. AMM, PCCM and VMM each operate as a physician practice management company and are in the business of providing management services to physician practice corporations under long-term management service agreements. ApolloMed ACO participates in the MSSP, the goal of which is to improve the quality of patient care and outcomes through more efficient and coordinated approach among providers.

Our recent financial highlights, as more fully discussed below, include that for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2014, we had:

Three Months

Nine months

* Approximately $5.4 million of the revenue for the nine months ended December 31, 2014 was derived from a receivable from CMS (the payment for which was received in October, 2014) related to ApolloMed ACO's portion of shared savings achieved during the period of July 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013. No assurance can be made that such a payment will be made in the future, and if any payment is made, it would be made on an annual basis.

Recent Developments

SCHC Transaction

Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 21, 2014 (the “Purchase Agreement”) among the Southern California Heart Centers, a Medical Corporation, a medical group that provides professional medical services in Los Angeles County, California (“SCHC”), the shareholders of SCHC (the “Sellers”) and a Company affiliate, SCHC Acquisition, A Medical Corporation (the “Affiliate”), solely owned by Dr. Warren Hosseinion, a physician and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, the Affiliate acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of SCHC from the Sellers. SCHC was acquired by an affiliate of the Company because of certain laws regarding the corporate practice of medicine, as described below in “Our Business - Fee Splitting and Corporate Practice of Medicine.” The purchase price for the shares was (i) $2,000,000 in cash, (ii) $362,646 to pay off and discharge certain indebtedness of SCHC (iii) warrants to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share and (iv) an amount contingent on SCHC meeting specific target “Work Relative Value Units” of up to $1,000,000 payable, if at all, in cash. The acquisition was funded by an intercompany loan from Apollo Medical Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“AMM”), which also provided an indemnity in favor of one of the Sellers relating to certain indebtedness of SCHC that remained outstanding following the closing of the acquisition. Following the acquisition of SCHC, the Affiliate was merged with and into SCHC, with SCHC being the surviving corporation.

In connection with the acquisition of SCHC, AMM entered into a management services agreement with the Affiliate on July 21, 2014. As a result of the Affiliate’s merger with and into SCHC, SCHC is now the counterparty to this management services agreement and bound by its terms. Pursuant to the management services agreement, AMM will manage all non-medical services for SCHC and will have exclusive authority over all non-medical decision making related to the ongoing business operations of SCHC, and is the primary beneficiary of SCHC, and the financial statements of SCHC will be consolidated as a variable interest entity with those of the Company from July 21, 2014.

NNA Proceeds

On July 31, 2014, the Company received proceeds of $2,000,000 from the NNA Convertible Note. In connection with this drawdown, the Company issued 100,000 warrants to NNA with an exercise price of $10.00 per share.

On October 24, 2014, the Company received $1 million from its revolving line of credit with NNA, which revolving line of credit was provided as part of NNA’s 2014 arrangements with the Company, and is described below in “Our Business - NNA Financing Arrangements.”

The Credit Agreement and the NNA Convertible Note provide for certain financial covenants. On February 16, 2015, the Company and NNA agreed to amend, effective as of December 30, 2014, the tangible net worth covenant computation. The Company was in compliance with the amended financial covenants as of December 31, 2014.

Khalil Settlement

On October 23, 2014, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) with Raouf Khalil (“Khalil”). Effective October 23, 2014, the Settlement Agreement terminates the Company’s obligations with respect to Khalil under that certain Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2011 (the “Purchase Agreement”), among the Company, Aligned Healthcare Group, LLC (“Aligned LLC”), Aligned Healthcare Group – California, Inc. (“Aligned Corp.”), Khalil, Jamie McReynolds, M.D., BJ Reese and BJ Reese & Associates, LLC (collectively, the “Aligned Affiliates”), as amended by that certain First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2011, among the Company, Aligned LLC, Aligned Corp., Khalil, Jamie McReynolds, M.D., BJ Reese and BJ Reese & Associates, LLC.  Under the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Aligned Healthcare, Inc. (“AHI”) in order to provide patient care management services and to manage and operate 24-hour physician and nursing call centers.  Following the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, Khalil acted as Chief Executive Officer and President of AHI under a consulting agreement, and was appointed to the Board of Directors of the Company.  Khalil resigned as a director of the Company on June 1, 2011.

Under the Settlement Agreement, the Company has reconveyed to Khalil all of the shares of AHI common stock that the Company acquired from Khalil under the Purchase Agreement. In addition, in consideration of a $10,000 cash payment, Khalil has reconveyed to the Company 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, constituting all of the remaining shares that he still owned that were issued to him under the Purchase Agreement. Following these reconveyances, the Company no longer owns any of the outstanding shares of AHI’s capital stock, and neither Khalil nor any of the other Aligned Affiliates own any shares of the Company’s capital stock.

The Settlement Agreement was entered into by the parties to settle and resolve any claims, differences or disagreements that may exist between the Company and Khalil, and the Settlement Agreement provides for a mutual general release of all claims between the Company and Khalil.

Apollo Palliative Services LLC and Affiliates Acquisitions

On October 27, 2014, AMM, an affiliate of the Company made an initial capital contribution of $613,889 (the “Initial Contribution”) to ApolloMed Palliative in exchange for 51% of the membership interests of ApolloMed Palliative. ApolloMed Palliative used the Initial Contribution, in conjunction with funds provided by other investors in ApolloMed Palliative, to finance the closing payments described immediately below. In connection with this arrangement, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with one of ApolloMed Palliative’s members. The consulting agreement has a 6 year term, and provides for the member to receive $15,000 in cash per month, and for the member to be eligible to receive stock-based awards under the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Immediately prior to closing the transactions described below, and as condition precedent to ApolloMed Palliative closing the transactions, the selling equity owners in each transaction contributed specific equity interests to ApolloMed Palliative in return for interests in ApolloMed Palliative pursuant to contributions agreements.

Subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “BCHC Agreement”), dated October 27, 2014, by and among ApolloMed Palliative, the Company, the members of Best Choice Hospice Care, LLC, a California limited liability company (“BCHC”), and BCHC, ApolloMed Palliative agreed to purchase all of the remaining membership interests in BCHC for $900,000 in cash, subject to reduction if BCHC’s working capital was less than $145,000 as of the closing of the transaction. ApolloMed Palliative agreed to pay a contingent payment of up to a further $400,000 (the “BCHC Contingent Payment”) to one seller and one employee of BCHC. The BCHC Contingent Payment will be paid in two installments of $100,000 to each of the seller and the employee within sixty days of each of the first and second anniversaries of the transaction, and is contingent upon, as of each applicable date, the seller’s and the employee’s employment, as applicable, continuing or having been terminated without cause and, for the employee, meeting certain productivity targets. The Company absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed payment of the BCHC Contingent Payment if ApolloMed Palliative fails to make any payment.

Subject to the terms and conditions of that certain Stock Purchase Agreement (the “HCHHA Agreement”), dated October 27, 2014, by and among ApolloMed Palliative, the sole shareholder of Holistic Care Home Health Agency, Inc., a California corporation (“HCHHA”), and HCHHA, ApolloMed Palliative agreed to purchase all of the remaining shares of HCHHA for $300,000 in cash, subject to reduction if HCHHA’s working capital was less than $50,000 as of the closing of the transaction. ApolloMed Palliative agreed to pay a contingent payment of up to a further $150,000 (the “HCHHA Contingent Payment”). The HCHHA Contingent Payment will be paid in two installments of $75,000 to the seller within sixty days of each of the first and second anniversaries of the transaction, and is contingent upon, as of each applicable date, the seller’s employment continuing or having been terminated without cause and the seller meeting certain productivity targets.

Following the consummation of the transactions described above, the Company continued to own 51% of the membership interests of ApolloMed Palliative, which now owns BCHC and HCHHA.

Management Services Agreement

On February 17, 2015, the Company entered into a long-term management services agreement (“Bay Area MSA”) with a hospitalist group located in the San Francisco Bay area. Under the Bay Area MSA, the Company will provide all business administrative services, including billing, accounting, human resources management and supervision of all non-medical business operations. The Company has evaluated the impact of the Bay Area MSA and is expecting to consolidate this hospitalist group into the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and therefore would expect to meet the requirements for consolidated entities under the NNA agreements.

Results of Operations

NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 (As Restated) (Unaudited)

The Company’s results of operations were as follows for the nine months ended December 31:

The following table sets forth consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended December 31 stated as a percentage of net revenues:

Net revenues are comprised of net billings under the various fee structures from health plans, medical groups/IPA’s and hospitals, and income from service fee agreements. The increase was attributable to:

Cost of services are comprised primarily of physician compensation and related expenses. The (increase) decrease was attributable to:

Cost of services as percentage of net revenues decreased principally due to the lower cost of ACO shared savings revenue (of approximately 26.0%).

General and administrative expenses include all non-physician salaries, benefits, supplies and operating expenses, including billing and collections functions, and our corporate management and overhead not specifically related to the day-to-day operations of our physician group practices. The (increase) decrease in general and administrative expenses was attributable to:

Depreciation and amortization increased due to the acquisition of AKM, SCHC, BCHC and HCHHA which added additional depreciation expense of approximately $135,000 and additional amortization expense of $229,000 related to the intangible assets acquired during the current fiscal year (See Note 3 – Acquisitions in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

Interest expense increased in 2014 primarily due to higher interest expense due to an increase in borrowings primarily related to the 2014 NNA financing.

The change in fair value of the warrant and conversion liability resulted from the change in the fair value measurement of the Company’s warrant and conversion feature liability, which considers among other things, expected term, the volatility of the Company’s share price, interest rates, and the probability of additional financing of the underlying NNA Term Loan and the NNA Convertible Note.

Net loss attributable to Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. decreased primarily due to ACO shared savings revenue partially offset by higher cost of medical services in ACC, MMG, SCHC, BCHC, and HCHHA; and an increase in legal and professional fees and stock-based compensation.

For the nine months ended December 31, 2014, cash provided by operating activities was $652,315. This was the result of net loss of $1,363,055 offset by cash provided by non-cash expenses of $1,459,471 and the change in working capital of $555,899. Non-cash expenses primarily include depreciation expense, issuance stock-based compensation expense, amortization of financing costs, and accretion of debt discount.

Cash provided by working capital was due to:

Cash used by working capital was due to:

For the nine months ended December 31, 2014, cash used in investing activities was $2,674,559 related to the acquisitions of BCHC, HCHHA, AKM and SCHC aggregating $3,076,233 (net of cash and cash equivalents acquired of $660,893); and investment in office and technology equipment, partially offset by the proceeds of $438,884 from the sale of marketable securities.

For the nine months ended December 31, 2014, net cash provided by financing activities was $2,142,529 primarily as the result of the issuance of convertible notes payable of $2,000,000, $1,000,000 proceeds from the line of credit and the contributions by a non-controlling interest of $586,111 offset by principal payments on the term loan of $813,582, debt issuance costs of $20,000, the repurchase of common stock of $10,000 and distributions of $600,000 to a non-controlling interest shareholder.

TWO MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 COMPARED TO TWO MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 (Unaudited)

The Company’s results of operations were as follows for the two months ended March 31:

The following table sets forth consolidated statements of operations for the two months ended March 31 stated as a percentage of net revenues:

Net revenues are comprised of net billings under the various fee structures from health plans, medical groups/IPA’s and hospitals, and income from service fee agreements. The increase was attributable to:

Cost of services are comprised primarily of physician compensation and related expenses. The increase was attributable to:

Cost of services as percentage of net revenues increased principally due to higher medical costs associated with ACC’s clinic operation and higher proportion of Medi-Cal patient lives added to MMG for the two months ended March 31, 2014.

General and administrative expenses include all non-physician salaries, benefits, supplies and operating expenses, including billing and collections functions, and our corporate management and overhead not specifically related to the day-to-day operations of our physician group practices. The Company is also funding initiatives associated with establishment of ApolloMed ACO, MMG, and ACC, which had limited or no revenue for the two months ended March 31, 2014. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to:

Loss from operations increased primarily due to higher cost of medical services in ACC and MMG and an increase in spending associated with the ACO initiative.

Other expense increased in 2014 primarily due to higher interest expense due to an increase in borrowings partially offset by a gain from extinguishment of debt associated the 2014 NNA Financing pay off the medical clinic acquisition promissory notes.

Net loss attributable to Apollo Medical Holdings, Inc. increased primarily due to higher cost of medical services in ACC and MMG and an increase in spending associated with the ACO, ACC and MMG initiatives.

Two months ended March 31, 2014

For the two months ended March 31, 2014, cash used in operating activities was $8,895. This was the result of net losses of $ 766,442 offset by cash provided by non-cash expenses of $88,323 and change in working capital of $613,390. Non-cash expenses primarily include depreciation expense, issuance stock-based compensation expense, amortization of financing costs, and amortization of debt discount.

Cash provided by working capital was due to:

Cash used by working capital was due to:

For the two months ended March 31, 2014, cash used in investing activities was $12,228 related to the ApolloMed Care Clinic and investment in office and technology equipment.

For the two months ended March 31, 2014, net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $5.4 million primarily related to $7,000,000 in term loan proceeds and $2,000,000 proceeds associated with the issuance of shares in connection with the 2014 NNA Financing, net of repayment of existing NNA line of credit and transaction costs; $200,000 in distributions to a non-controlling interest shareholder; $256,000 repayment of medical clinic acquisition promissory notes; and approximately $98,000 in cash payments associated with the 8% convertible notes redemption.

YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2014 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2013

Net revenues comprise net billings under the various fee structures from health plans, medical groups/IPAs and hospitals, and income from service fee agreements. The increase was attributable to:

Cost of services is primarily comprised of physician compensation and related expenses. The increase was attributable to:

Cost of services as a percentage of net revenues increased principally due to a mix of newly acquired primary care clinic operations and the launch of Maverick Medical Group, Inc. in fiscal 2014.

General and administrative expenses comprise all salaries, benefits, supplies and operating expenses, including billing and collections functions, and the Company’s corporate management and overhead not specifically related to the day-to-day operations of our physician group practices. The increase was attributable to:

Loss from operations increased primarily due to spending on the MMG and ACO initiatives.

The decrease in loss on change in fair value of derivative liabilities reflects the change in the fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities as follows: